Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
About GMs philosophies...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DILLIGAFF" data-source="post: 274136" data-attributes="member: 1719"><p>I am a fan of the 3-4 defense, I just believe we are still a year away from being what everyone thinks we are statically, that top defense. </p><p> </p><p>I don't know anything for sure, but if we did and it is not so out of the question because TT did draft well for the 3-4 defense, Had he done it for the 4-3, we would have been much further along going into 2010.</p><p> </p><p>I am just pointing out there is a short term cost to this switch, made worse by wrong decisions by TT in personnel. </p><p> </p><p>The switch cost us more needs in this up and coming draft/free agency than we would have needed if we stayed with old system. Now in the long term we will sing the praises of this new defense, but there is a short term cost. </p><p> </p><p>IMO we have too many holes on this team for one draft to address, that being the O-line, secondary (safety and corner), and pass rusher in the front 7 to make a solid run for the super bowl. Even if TT has a repeat draft, he can fill 2 of the 3 holes only. </p><p> </p><p>If he had dealt with Kampman properly, his trade value or staying with the old system would have eliminated one of the 3 needs. We would have only 2 holes to fill this up and coming draft which is more realistic. Thats what I am saying the Packers gave up making this switch, the 2010 season will more than likely be a building year. Now in 2011 and after look out, the Packers will be on a mission.</p><p> </p><p>My opinion of TT is that he is night and day, no grey area. He can see talent in Mathews and make that call on moving up to get him, but he can't make the same judgment call with Kampman, costing the Packers a year and his true star value in 2008. As good as the Mathews pick is and will be, <strong>it was not like we got a great player in addition to Kampman, we are losing Kampman and still in need of a pass rusher.</strong> Its not all clear profit, we gave up a star player for this.</p><p> </p><p>I would still make an argument that Cullen Jenkins and Hawk are still not playing their ideal positions, they are performing in the 3-4 system, but not their ideal positions.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DILLIGAFF, post: 274136, member: 1719"] I am a fan of the 3-4 defense, I just believe we are still a year away from being what everyone thinks we are statically, that top defense. I don't know anything for sure, but if we did and it is not so out of the question because TT did draft well for the 3-4 defense, Had he done it for the 4-3, we would have been much further along going into 2010. I am just pointing out there is a short term cost to this switch, made worse by wrong decisions by TT in personnel. The switch cost us more needs in this up and coming draft/free agency than we would have needed if we stayed with old system. Now in the long term we will sing the praises of this new defense, but there is a short term cost. IMO we have too many holes on this team for one draft to address, that being the O-line, secondary (safety and corner), and pass rusher in the front 7 to make a solid run for the super bowl. Even if TT has a repeat draft, he can fill 2 of the 3 holes only. If he had dealt with Kampman properly, his trade value or staying with the old system would have eliminated one of the 3 needs. We would have only 2 holes to fill this up and coming draft which is more realistic. Thats what I am saying the Packers gave up making this switch, the 2010 season will more than likely be a building year. Now in 2011 and after look out, the Packers will be on a mission. My opinion of TT is that he is night and day, no grey area. He can see talent in Mathews and make that call on moving up to get him, but he can't make the same judgment call with Kampman, costing the Packers a year and his true star value in 2008. As good as the Mathews pick is and will be, [B]it was not like we got a great player in addition to Kampman, we are losing Kampman and still in need of a pass rusher.[/B] Its not all clear profit, we gave up a star player for this. I would still make an argument that Cullen Jenkins and Hawk are still not playing their ideal positions, they are performing in the 3-4 system, but not their ideal positions. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Packermudgeon
ThePerfectBeard
Green_Bay_Packers
Pkrjones
GreenBaySlacker
Schultz
Latest posts
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: OldSchool101
13 minutes ago
Draft Talk
2024 2nd Rd pick #58 Javon Bullard S
Latest: DoURant
18 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Not too soon 2024 roster prediction
Latest: GreenNGold_81
38 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The 11th Annual Amish Draft Contest 2024
Latest: OldSchool101
58 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Most hated teams outside of the division
Latest: GreenNGold_81
Today at 11:58 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
About GMs philosophies...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top