Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Magooch" data-source="post: 978139" data-attributes="member: 17987">I don't discount that it's part of the equation BUT if that is the case it's a bit concerning to me that it would seem to imply that...A.) Team docs apparently don't think it's serious enough to prevent him from playing (and thus would fall into an odd place where it's "serious enough to have a noticeable impact on performance" while also being "mild enough to not require missed time and/or risk of reinjury")OR, B.)  The coaching staff/etc feels that an injury-impacted Aaron Rodgers still gives us a better chance of winning than Jordan Love (and by extension that the risk of Rodgers re-injuring/exacerbating his injury still outweighs the benefits of starting Love)OR,C.) The coaching staff does believe that we would have a better chance of winning with Jordan Love but aren't playing him because they're afraid of upsetting Rodgers or something like thatNone of which are particularly encouraging to me...</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 420 (members: 0, guests: 420)