1. Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!

    Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers. You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user.

    Sign Up or

    Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions. Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member!
    Dismiss Notice

A possible change in draft tactics good/bad for us?

Discussion in 'Packer Fan Forum' started by Ausnadian, Mar 1, 2011.

  1. Ausnadian

    Ausnadian Cheesehead

    Jan 31, 2011
    Well, the Bengals are now willing to listen to trade offers for Palmer, which to me looks like they saw something they liked at the QB position and now aren't so worried about Calson moving.
    I have flip flopped on my earlier thought of not seeing 3 QBs go in the first round, but now it seems almost likely.

    I guess my point is that having CP available, makes it harder, I believe, to trade Flynn, which in turn could have the flow on effect of not being able to move up. There hasn't been any reported interest from other teams that I am aware of for Flynn, so it feels like our window may have just got smaller.
  2. ivo610

    ivo610 Cheesehead

    Feb 13, 2010
    I believe it would constitute tampering if someone made comments about wanting to go after Flynn. Trade discussions wont happen between teams until after the CBA is handed out. Dont worry, there are alot of teams interested.
  3. SpartaChris

    SpartaChris Cheesehead

    Dec 24, 2007
    Mike McCarthy already stated he has NO plans to trade Flynn. I think we can put that one to bed now.
  4. Texpackerfan

    Texpackerfan Cheesehead

    Dec 5, 2010
    If they trade Flynn, who would be the back up? Harrel? Or draft a untested QB? I don't believe there are many veteran QB's available for back up. Based on Rodgers injury history, it's better to have a decent back up in the wings.
  5. neilfii

    neilfii Hall of Fame Fan

    Jan 24, 2011
    A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush. I still don't think there is a player we need or a position we need to fill so desperately that it would be worth getting rid of a clearly qualified backup quarterback.

Share This Page