Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
A great Sherman Pick
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bruce" data-source="post: 33681" data-attributes="member: 196"><p><strong>What an interesting leap you make Raider...</strong></p><p></p><p>Raider Pride:</p><p></p><p>You make quite a few leaps here. At <strong>NO</strong> time did I ever come close to supporting or advocating censorship. What I said is endless rants that say the same thing over and over bury football discussion are tiresome and will drive away most real football discussion. I certainly support 66's and any other persons right to be critical of coaching, however does it need to high jack and/or bury every other thread. I have been critical of coaching -- but try to make my comments relevant and timely. How many times do we need to read the following before we figure out that Pack66 thinks Sherman sucks?:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>When Ryan created the Reggie Bush thread, was that censorship? R.P. you are an intelligent guy, where did anyone say that there should only be one side. Further, what side would you put me on? </p><p></p><p>It is an interesting paradox you present here. For me to say that endless rants drive good posters away -- some of whom are very connected to the game -- that is simply stating a fact. I proposed nothing, rather expressed my opinion about not liking to have to wade through so much crap and talked of knowing scouts and writers that retreat to a closed forum out of frustration. Good football discussion suffers. I have access, I can go and read their stuff and have dialogue but feel that we all lose in that process. Another poster than suggested the dedicated forum to Sherman discussion to free up room for other football discussions. For this you accuse me of censorship -- what a joke. It is you who is now trying to stifle my right to expression, based on a whole lot of assuming and attributing.</p><p></p><p>You are a good man R.P., but I think you might apply the same standard you are proposing to yourself. Obi1 proposed an idea and you condescendingly dismiss his suggestion as wrong and un-American, and than in some mysterious leap attribute his idea to me and tell me what I am doing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bruce, post: 33681, member: 196"] [b]What an interesting leap you make Raider...[/b] Raider Pride: You make quite a few leaps here. At [b]NO[/b] time did I ever come close to supporting or advocating censorship. What I said is endless rants that say the same thing over and over bury football discussion are tiresome and will drive away most real football discussion. I certainly support 66's and any other persons right to be critical of coaching, however does it need to high jack and/or bury every other thread. I have been critical of coaching -- but try to make my comments relevant and timely. How many times do we need to read the following before we figure out that Pack66 thinks Sherman sucks?: When Ryan created the Reggie Bush thread, was that censorship? R.P. you are an intelligent guy, where did anyone say that there should only be one side. Further, what side would you put me on? It is an interesting paradox you present here. For me to say that endless rants drive good posters away -- some of whom are very connected to the game -- that is simply stating a fact. I proposed nothing, rather expressed my opinion about not liking to have to wade through so much crap and talked of knowing scouts and writers that retreat to a closed forum out of frustration. Good football discussion suffers. I have access, I can go and read their stuff and have dialogue but feel that we all lose in that process. Another poster than suggested the dedicated forum to Sherman discussion to free up room for other football discussions. For this you accuse me of censorship -- what a joke. It is you who is now trying to stifle my right to expression, based on a whole lot of assuming and attributing. You are a good man R.P., but I think you might apply the same standard you are proposing to yourself. Obi1 proposed an idea and you condescendingly dismiss his suggestion as wrong and un-American, and than in some mysterious leap attribute his idea to me and tell me what I am doing. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Firethorn1001
Latest posts
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: milani
Today at 3:42 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
R
2024 3rd Rd #91 Ty’Ron Hopper LB
Latest: RicFlairoftheNFL
Today at 3:25 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 1:32 AM
Draft Talk
I had This Nightmare
Latest: Poppa San
Yesterday at 10:58 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
2024 Draft Prospect Discussions
Latest: Schultz
Yesterday at 10:41 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
A great Sherman Pick
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top