Sorry, but I think I'd take the 65 or 66 Packers over the 96. They were all great teams, but the 96ers were one hit wonders.
Where are the '62 Packers? 10 and 1; led the league in scoring and in fewest points allowed(besides wins, the only stats worth anything). Any computer that ignores any of the Packer teams of the '60's is seriously flawed.
Like all "greatest" discussions, it is impossible to compare teams or individuals from different eras, but I'll take the '62 team over any other.
I do not want to argue about two great Packer teams. It's going to be a generational argument.. I saw both teams. They were both great.
!962 Packers:
Points scored per game 29.6 NFL Rank #1
Points allowed per game 10.6 NFL Rank#1
Point diff. per game 19.1 NFL rank #1
Takeaway/giveaway margin +22 NFL Rank #1
1996 Packers
Points scored per game 28.5 NFL Rank #1
Points allowed per game 13.1 NFL Rank #1
Point diff. per game 15.4 NFL Rank #1
Takeaway/giveaway margin +15 NFL Rank #1
So God love em both.
Over the years I have owned a number computer simulation programs. I don't put faith in them but they were fun to do. Every time I would have the 1962 Packer team play the undefeated Dolphins or the 1985 Bears, the 62 Packers won the majority of games, Never thought of simulating the 96 Packers against those team, Will have to try. And now that the subject has come up, do I dare have the 62 Packers play the 96 Packers? I don't think I want to.