Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
2016 Draft Archive
5th Year Option....Could It Equal a Trade Back for the Pack?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tynimiller" data-source="post: 662375" data-attributes="member: 6578"><p>This is true, there is potential a different position player stays on the board and someone like NE calls...but this scenario revolves highly around QB. </p><p></p><p>The fact that everyone knows Wentz and Goff are gone #1 and #2 could force some teams with QB needs to really eye getting back into the late 1st prior to when they really "should" in most minds target say Lynch or even a Cook or Hackenberg if they are high on them.</p><p></p><p>Honestly, after reviewing some of the draft boards and positions...unless a sure thing along the DT or Ragland/Jack are there, I'm 100% in support of moving back into the 2nd + (additional whatever picks). At this point it would also appear a run on WRs is projected late 1st round by some....another position of covet some team may be willing to roll a trade on. </p><p></p><p>I think TT will get calls for sure...the question is can he play them in our favor more than they should be haha!?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tynimiller, post: 662375, member: 6578"] This is true, there is potential a different position player stays on the board and someone like NE calls...but this scenario revolves highly around QB. The fact that everyone knows Wentz and Goff are gone #1 and #2 could force some teams with QB needs to really eye getting back into the late 1st prior to when they really "should" in most minds target say Lynch or even a Cook or Hackenberg if they are high on them. Honestly, after reviewing some of the draft boards and positions...unless a sure thing along the DT or Ragland/Jack are there, I'm 100% in support of moving back into the 2nd + (additional whatever picks). At this point it would also appear a run on WRs is projected late 1st round by some....another position of covet some team may be willing to roll a trade on. I think TT will get calls for sure...the question is can he play them in our favor more than they should be haha!? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: milani
Today at 3:25 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: GreenBaySlacker
Today at 12:29 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Cornelius Weems
Today at 12:05 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 7:46 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: weeds
Yesterday at 6:52 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
2016 Draft Archive
5th Year Option....Could It Equal a Trade Back for the Pack?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top