Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
53 man roster?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="adambr2" data-source="post: 610587" data-attributes="member: 7277"><p>The reason I picked Crockett over Ripkowski is that I think a 3rd tailback is more important than a 2nd fullback. </p><p></p><p>I doubt we would open the roster with Lacy and Starks as our only potential tailbacks. I'm not sold on Ripskowski making the opening day roster. 6th round picks are crapshoots. Ripkowski was considered a borderline 7th/UDFA for the draft. If he doesn't make the cut, he can probably be stashed on the practice squad for dept and still learn there. I doubt many teams are going to be out looking for a new fullback that wasn't even with them for training camp after they set their 53.</p><p></p><p>It's also possible that Ripkowski beats out Kuhn entirely. I suppose it's also possible that we carry 2 fullbacks, but I don't think it's the best chance. Really, I don't think any of us have an idea until training camp who has a better shot between Ripkowski and Crockett, but just based on the numbers if we are splitting halfback and fullback, I doubt we see a 2/2 mix. I just grouped them together for simplicity.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="adambr2, post: 610587, member: 7277"] The reason I picked Crockett over Ripkowski is that I think a 3rd tailback is more important than a 2nd fullback. I doubt we would open the roster with Lacy and Starks as our only potential tailbacks. I'm not sold on Ripskowski making the opening day roster. 6th round picks are crapshoots. Ripkowski was considered a borderline 7th/UDFA for the draft. If he doesn't make the cut, he can probably be stashed on the practice squad for dept and still learn there. I doubt many teams are going to be out looking for a new fullback that wasn't even with them for training camp after they set their 53. It's also possible that Ripkowski beats out Kuhn entirely. I suppose it's also possible that we carry 2 fullbacks, but I don't think it's the best chance. Really, I don't think any of us have an idea until training camp who has a better shot between Ripkowski and Crockett, but just based on the numbers if we are splitting halfback and fullback, I doubt we see a 2/2 mix. I just grouped them together for simplicity. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
rmontro
Magooch
shockerx
Latest posts
R
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: rmontro
7 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: Schultz
Today at 1:59 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: tynimiller
Today at 12:04 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 10:55 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
P
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pugger
Yesterday at 4:38 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
53 man roster?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top