Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
53 man roster?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TJV" data-source="post: 610174" data-attributes="member: 4300"><p>Rodney at Packers Notes has an article titled, "Roster spots at a Premium" <a href="http://packersnotes.com/2015/05/roster-spots-at-a-premium-in-green-bay/" target="_blank">http://packersnotes.com/2015/05/roster-spots-at-a-premium-in-green-bay/</a> Here's what he has to say about QB and why some of us are less than enthusiastic about trading up for Hundley: For the sake of roster spots it would be best if Hundley beats out Tolzien but as Rodney says that's unlikely - IMO <em>extremely </em>unlikely. Being able to keep the 54th best prospect without exposing him to waivers (to get him to the PS) may not be a big deal, but that's the reason the Packers would prefer to have 2 QBs on the active roster and a developmental QB on the PS.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TJV, post: 610174, member: 4300"] Rodney at Packers Notes has an article titled, "Roster spots at a Premium" [URL]http://packersnotes.com/2015/05/roster-spots-at-a-premium-in-green-bay/[/URL] Here's what he has to say about QB and why some of us are less than enthusiastic about trading up for Hundley: For the sake of roster spots it would be best if Hundley beats out Tolzien but as Rodney says that's unlikely - IMO [I]extremely [/I]unlikely. Being able to keep the 54th best prospect without exposing him to waivers (to get him to the PS) may not be a big deal, but that's the reason the Packers would prefer to have 2 QBs on the active roster and a developmental QB on the PS. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Staff online
Poppa San
* Team Owner *
G
griffin
Administrator
Members online
PackerDNA
Poppa San
lancer84
griffin
Latest posts
games in Iowa - Newbie (be gentle, LOL)
Latest: lancer84
9 minutes ago
Introduce Yourself
My double secret probation final mock draft
Latest: Poppa San
14 minutes ago
Draft Talk
H
2024 Draft Prospect Discussions
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 6:43 PM
Draft Talk
2024 Clusters
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 6:41 PM
Draft Talk
Bucks v. Pacers
Latest: weeds
Today at 6:38 PM
Milwaukee Bucks Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
53 man roster?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top