Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 962542" data-attributes="member: 10086">I’m an advocate of paying guys close to what they are worth (I don’t like overpaying and I don’t like underpaying unless it’s justifiable)   The good news is he’s not a must have. He’d be a luxury and thus we can risk the wait and his value drops if anything.I think you could argue as a #4 CB that his worth to the team is significantly less and thus his role likely not as pronounced.  I’d absolutely feel fine if we offer him in that $2-3M range. That’s cheap insurance and he’s a very experienced CB.We need to keep in mind that he’s likely covering the #3-4 type WR more. We are used to seeing him cover 1’s and 2’s.  Im just guessing that he’d fair better in a lesser capacity role.  He’d probably be good on ST just watching how he’s pretty good at disrupting downhill</blockquote>

Total: 1,104 (members: 1, guests: 1,103)