Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="DoURant" data-source="post: 906757" data-attributes="member: 12388"><p>Tony Pauline had Stokes at #44 on his board, in contrast, Asante Samuel Jr was #57, but so many wanted him in the 1st rd., wouldn't that have been a reach?  Anyone who hasn't been listening or paying attention to RAS over 8.0 for Packers draft Picks and preferably over 9.0.... you were warned this is what they look for, and will probably draft.  I'm a huge Moehrig fan, my favorite guy in this draft in fact... He along with Samuel both had a RAS score in the 7's. Saying we could have traded back or we over-drafted someone late in the 1st rd. is lazy... If a team likes someone, the difference between 25 and 65 in prospect rankings is actually really close, and every team ranks players differently. They probably have someone they are targeting in the 2nd rd, we needed a CB, we got one.... One more thing, what makes everyone think Elijah Moore should have been the WR pick?  Where does his 5'9" profile fit in this administrations WR view?  I think they may have taken Bateman over Stokes if he was still there....Why? because he's over 6 ft. tall.  I do see us drafting a WR on day 2, maybe even trading up in the 2nd to get a guy they like, but if not oh well, there's definitely plenty of needs to be addressed like DT, OT, C and LB.  WR is really deep in this draft, have patience.</p></blockquote><p></p>

No members online now.

Total: 1,612 (members: 0, guests: 1,612)