gopkrs
Cheesehead
- Joined
- May 12, 2014
- Messages
- 8,213
- Reaction score
- 3,027
Survive? We'd better win.At least there are 10 days off until the next game. I hope we survive tonight.
Survive? We'd better win.At least there are 10 days off until the next game. I hope we survive tonight.
We barely survived. Winning is too far outside of this team's wheelhouse right now.Survive? We'd better win.
@El Guapo where has your humor been when we need you!We barely survived. Winning is too far outside of this team's wheelhouse right now.
How many years did that take? He had some help from that Nimitz guy too!Remember those words of General McCarthur in the Philippines:
" I shall return. "
Yeah. Let’s hope it doesn’t involve taking prisoners and 2 years!How many years did that take? He had some help from that Nimitz guy too!
Between 1972 and 1992 took 20 years. We cannot let that happen again.How many years did that take? He had some help from that Nimitz guy too!
Milani maybe that’s why I’m battle hardened to these games where we spiral. I started watching football in the early 70’s and it was just our identity to lose. Football was mostly a sideshow to watch while doing another activity otherwise it would ruin your day.Between 1972 and 1992 took 20 years. We cannot let that happen again.
They certainly had. But there were many teams that saw huge droughts and you feel for their fans. The question is do you flounder for a season or two or do you become a perennial loser.Milani maybe that’s why I’m battle hardened to these games where we spiral. I started watching football in the early 70’s and it was just our identity to lose. Football was mostly a sideshow to watch while doing another activity otherwise it would ruin your day.
Fans that only watch modern era (call it the last 30 years) have been spoiled with success.
Well sometime a full shakeup is one of those grass isn’t greener on the other side. Some in here just assume we’ll not skip a beat and that’s rarely true. I true shakeup and at minimum we’re probably talking 3yrs to regain footing and possibly we’d going a search for relevance that last a decade or more.They certainly had. But there were many teams that saw huge droughts and you feel for their fans. The question is do you flounder for a season or two or do you become a perennial loser.
Should reduce the point spread from 14 point underdogs to possibly 6.Not Packers injuries related, but Mayfield with the thumb injury and Williams a 3-4 week thing, looks like Packers might be facing a few backups next 2 weeks.
Should reduce the point spread from 14 point underdogs to possibly 6.
Well we could use any help right now. Although not exactly how I’d want it to play out, but every team goes through injuries. I knew Caleb wouldn’t be back. Ben Johnson really thinks everyone is just dumb as a tick. He claimed Caleb was a gametime decision for Monday. What the heck is that guy smokingNot Packers injuries related, but Mayfield with the thumb injury and Williams a 3-4 week thing, looks like Packers might be facing a few backups next 2 weeks.
Or plateau as a winning team each season but with limited success if the post-season.They certainly had. But there were many teams that saw huge droughts and you feel for their fans. The question is do you flounder for a season or two or do you become a perennial loser.
Right. When he had his plan he evaluated the people he had. And if they did not fill the bill he shopped elsewhere. Of course, he did not have to deal with these contracts.Or plateau as a winning team each season but with limited success if the post-season.
I don't ever remember GB having an OL this bad. Lombardi couldn't coach this team up.
Why start at '72? How about from '68?Between 1972 and 1992 took 20 years. We cannot let that happen again.
'72 was a division champion & playoffs season. The last excluding strike year until the mid 90s.Why start at '72? How about from '68?
True. But we were surprisingly 10-4 in 1972 and won the division with a young team. After that it was a long drought.Why start at '72? How about from '68?
Sure, it's all subjective. However, having lived through it (and well before) the three losing seasons of the four prior to '72 count as the start of the Gory Years for me, with '72 itself just being there to give us a little confidence, with those hopes being dashed for the next two decades.True. But we were surprisingly 10-4 in 1972 and won the division with a young team. After that it was a long drought.
Dashed is exactly the word.Sure, it's all subjective. However, having lived through it (and well before) the three losing seasons of the four prior to '72 count as the start of the Gory Years for me, with '72 itself just being there to give us a little confidence, with those hopes being dashed for the next two decades.
I was in college in the 70s. I remember readng the Packer results over bfast in the student union. Dark days.Dashed is exactly the word.
DAL @ GB