Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1093965" data-attributes="member: 10086">I think similar on playing time, although as someone (Tyni?) pointed out recently, we actually have increased playing time for Rookies over past years. Obviously there’s some exceptions like Golden or Belton or even Morgan at the top and they get all the focus. Some of that was drafting position overlap to be prepared for? … today!Overall we’ve got a pretty good hit rate on playing time. Quay, Wyatt, Cooper, Evan, Brooks, Kraft, Doubs, Watson etc.On that note. In some years I would like to scratch projection players until Day 3. Occasionally plug a RD1 or RD2 with a high floor player that can pretty much start yesterday. Yet might have some risk not being super duper high upside.  Using #52 this year I’d like to go after an athlete who we can plug n play without great concern.  I wouldn’t even be opposed to using #84 overall and packaging a 2027 5th Rounder etc to move up earlier and get a pair that fit that bill. Especially if a player we have graded #50 (Ponds!) overall slips out of RD2 and it’s a really good CB or DT or Edge.</blockquote>

Total: 492 (members: 1, guests: 491)