OldSchool101
Pack
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2014
- Messages
- 19,003
- Reaction score
- 9,281
What I forgot about him is he actually has significant NFL playing time with more than adequate production. The only thing is he profiles similar to Musgrave. Meaning sometimes you want a blend at TE. A true Blocker with minimal receiving ability. A true Vertical threat with minimal blocking ability. A cross over blocker and receiving TE with no massive ceiling but a high floor across the board. TE’s won’t always possess all attributes at a high level (thats the goal but unrealistic). My only reservation on Whyle is he too similar to Musgrave if that makes sense? I’d almost rather have a young Mercedes that just moves the DE like a Tackle, but can get you a pair of 1st down receptions for 20 yards, maybe float into the paint for a rare TD.I broke Whyle down in some other thread too, he has potential. I watched him closely in PS and his chances he's had, he is not going to push Luke IMO BUT has that potential if that makes sense. He is quite quick but is no where a violent block assistant like you'd hope and more or less his most effective form of blocking relies on technique or PURELY BEING IN THE WAY. He is however a fairly good pass protecting blocking when asked due to his athletic profile, but run game he is not moving anyone out of the way.
Route running I will say I feel he is better than Luke, while quick he isn't purely reliant on his athleticism to get him open and actually has better foot technique in and out of breaks.
Many might remember he was on my Top 5 TE watchlist prior to his final year in college and he just didn't do the growth I expected, not bad but I expected an explosion year.
My best guess is Luke is a 500 yard
4-5 TD type TE, nothing shameful about that if you compliment him with another 300 yards 2-3 TD version TE (Whyle)
Last edited:
