Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2025 NFL Free Agency
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tynimiller" data-source="post: 1059268" data-attributes="member: 6578"><p>Eh by nearly all metrics GB were still one of the Top offenses in the league Top5 in many that matter. Continued growth is not something on a whim, but is something you traditionally see in players. I strongly suspect that the massive issue inside the entire WR room, except for Watson, of drops won't be an infection like it seemed to be again and that alone would cause a small bump. </p><p></p><p>This offense also dealt with a limited or gone TE2 and an unknown commodity in Lloyd being out...getting them both back for sure at minimum is a bump in the positive direction. Our offensive line returning 4 of our 5 main starters (and a guy in Morgan that started a game and split time when he was healthy at RG). </p><p></p><p>I agree this year is not the hot commodity year when it comes to offensive side of the ball for the top shelf type moves you can do to move the needle. BUT as we have often seen in the league it is not the only way to increase the level. Even if we add a veteran depth iOL, an experienced TE3 and a WR all of being mid-tier level type guys would be an excellent thing for the offense as a whole. </p><p></p><p>It continues to crack me up how folks just don't understand the logic behind signing MVS IF the road led to that. Waiting till after the draft will allow you to know if you drafted a guy with the vertical threat but perhaps not as polished all around game (MVS blocks well for his role) and you have no need. However, IF we don't get Slayton or see Gute add one of my lessor desired guys like say Godwin or such....AND we don't draft a burner, MVS on a cheap one year deal for that role which we don't have being filled holds immense value. And for the depth of target MVS typically has, his catch percentage is barely low to most deep threats except for the absolute elites of history at it (DeSean Jackson as example). </p><p></p><p>Personally, would much prefer the Slayton signing and then getting a Jalen Royals or another burner (Thornton later or others) over MVS signing...but again a lot depends on what all can and does happen in both FA and also the draft.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tynimiller, post: 1059268, member: 6578"] Eh by nearly all metrics GB were still one of the Top offenses in the league Top5 in many that matter. Continued growth is not something on a whim, but is something you traditionally see in players. I strongly suspect that the massive issue inside the entire WR room, except for Watson, of drops won't be an infection like it seemed to be again and that alone would cause a small bump. This offense also dealt with a limited or gone TE2 and an unknown commodity in Lloyd being out...getting them both back for sure at minimum is a bump in the positive direction. Our offensive line returning 4 of our 5 main starters (and a guy in Morgan that started a game and split time when he was healthy at RG). I agree this year is not the hot commodity year when it comes to offensive side of the ball for the top shelf type moves you can do to move the needle. BUT as we have often seen in the league it is not the only way to increase the level. Even if we add a veteran depth iOL, an experienced TE3 and a WR all of being mid-tier level type guys would be an excellent thing for the offense as a whole. It continues to crack me up how folks just don't understand the logic behind signing MVS IF the road led to that. Waiting till after the draft will allow you to know if you drafted a guy with the vertical threat but perhaps not as polished all around game (MVS blocks well for his role) and you have no need. However, IF we don't get Slayton or see Gute add one of my lessor desired guys like say Godwin or such....AND we don't draft a burner, MVS on a cheap one year deal for that role which we don't have being filled holds immense value. And for the depth of target MVS typically has, his catch percentage is barely low to most deep threats except for the absolute elites of history at it (DeSean Jackson as example). Personally, would much prefer the Slayton signing and then getting a Jalen Royals or another burner (Thornton later or others) over MVS signing...but again a lot depends on what all can and does happen in both FA and also the draft. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: DoURant
Yesterday at 8:17 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
P
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pugger
Yesterday at 4:38 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 3:46 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 3:44 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 3:40 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2025 NFL Free Agency
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
