Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 1057371" data-attributes="member: 7261">???Not sure what you are trying to say here.  Probation?With any player under contract, you have to look at sunk costs and future costs in 2 different ways.  The Packers sunk costs in JA are what they are, they can't vanish into thin air.  They are a result of contractual decisions made in the past and have to be accounted for, whether it is all at once or divided up over 2 or more seasons.The Packers should only be looking at the future costs of holding onto JA, as should any team that might be interested in trading for him.  Future costs include, base salary, workout bonuses, game bonuses, roster bonuses, and any incentive bonuses that could be earned in the future.  In addition to looking at the future costs of holding on to JA, the Packers should also consider the cost of replacing JA, if they part ways.Unless the Packers or another team tear up JA's current contract, those future costs of having JA on the roster are the same for the Packers, as they are for any team that would acquire him (and his contract) via a trade.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 1,004 (members: 0, guests: 1,004)