Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1048078" data-attributes="member: 10086">See for myself it was a more C-/D+ Offensive performance. F??? Really? Cmon. This was a D allowing the 7th least points and they ranked top 3 in many Defensive rankings. Top that it’s their house. Winning on the Road is always tougher imoFor me? It’s OUR Defense that got gashed a bunch. We allowed 300 yards in under 3 Quarters. Chicago was pacing 215 rushing yards when I checked with 1 Quarter to go. You’re not going to win much allowing >200 Rushing imo. Chicago wiped out butts with the gameclock.This was Chicago Offense that had not scored a TD since Dec 1922!  They went through us like we were Jacksonville. The bears were 12/19 on 3rd/4th downs vs Packers 1/6</blockquote>

Total: 809 (members: 3, guests: 806)