Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 1028877" data-attributes="member: 7261">We are definitely thinking along the same lines.  No doubt in my mind that the Packers have to go after at least 1 if not 2 FA Safeties.  No way should they try to fill that need strictly through the draft.  I think by the time Free Agency and the draft are over, the Packers have at least 3 new safeties on the roster.As far as RB goes.  I only pointed out the supply of both the FA and draft stock of decent RB's to bring home the fact that the Packers don't have to break the bank at the position.  No need to spend a lot of money or high draft stock for a backup/2nd back and they still should come away with a qualified guy.  The good news for the Packers, some teams will break the bank on a Sequon Barkley or Josh Jacobs and that should add available RB's in the draft for the Packers to snag at a perceived bargain.  On the other end of that, because of the supply, a guy like FA Gus Edwards may not get much attention and might sign for $2-3M.  It's a good year to need a backup RB and despite the combine, not that bad of year to need a starting safety.</blockquote>

Total: 823 (members: 1, guests: 822)