Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1036431" data-attributes="member: 10086">That’s a good point.Have you looked more in depth at the cause of those or are they correctable? IdkDo you think that issue is enough to still knock a later 3rd round grade on him?  Like drop him rounds or something?Ill start. While no one can see the future. I doubt the Packers spend an #88 if they thought he would fumble repeatedly or if they thought he was helpless. This was almost exactly the argument with Jordan Love btw.  That INT concern turned out to be a largely blown way out of proportion snd if memory serves me we had complaints he was the worst in College football.Is it possible that’s the case here a bit of overblown concern.  Idk. I do know his carry count is low for drafted RB which tells me that samples are not kind to % on that stuff. Double his snap count it could be in normal range etc.Lastly I think those concerns hit fans harder than our Staff.  In GB I see a pretty capable and confident group with good success with our RB’s room. I think that #88 selection was the Top 50 area selection on our board that Brian spoke of when he picked up a 3rd Rounder in the Rasul trade.</blockquote>

Total: 528 (members: 4, guests: 524)