Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1041237" data-attributes="member: 10086">Yeah. I agree. I just think at #88 or #95 or whatnot that’s a coin flip. If you get 5 out of 10 across 10 drafts probably ok. The only thing I would say is by the time we’ve drafted double digit numbers of 3rd Rounders over a Decade of sample? Probably should have 1 playing way above expectations, which we really didn’t have either. This my C C- gradeIf the bulk of our drafts were at #65 or #72 or #77 then ok.. we probably should get more in that 60% success rate. #95 overall might as well be an early Day 3 prospect. It’s pretty picked over edging near 100 overall. If we still are able to get 1 good Starter from Hopper or Lloyd by year 2?I think we’re fine. I’ve personally been a little disappointed in Rhyan. I thought he would be a mainstay starter by now.Yet Fackrell turned out to be pretty good. I thought Monty played pretty good as that utility hybrid player he was a good athlete in all phases, then went a little rogue out of nowhere. Deguara showed signs and then fizzled. Stern never took off. Burks was banged up initially and then I thought playing out of his natural Safety position where he excelled. They were trying to turn him into a project. Amari Rodgers was a total wasted pick. LolOur 2nd Round seems to be more magic and our 4th-5th rounds have been above average.  It all buffs out</blockquote>

Total: 979 (members: 3, guests: 976)