Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Magooch" data-source="post: 1057753" data-attributes="member: 17987">I don't know if it has to be Higgins per se specifically. But I guess my point is just...if you have the opportunity to sign a *proven* player for a given position, I'd rather do that than put your hopes on a "maybe". I mean, that's pretty much what we did this year, in some ways (and the year before that...and maybe even arguably the year before that one with Cobb and Lazard as the only "proven" guys, lol).Especially if we think we could get some kind of decent return for a guy like a Reed or a Doubs. A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush, as they say. But, I dunno. There's not any one clear answer for me. It's true that next year's crop will likely be better, but it's not like we're the only team who will be aware of this and (potentially) in need of a WR too. I don't know...I guess that just feels more like a "reactive" approach than a "proactive" one to me.</blockquote>

Total: 321 (members: 4, guests: 317)