Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="tynimiller" data-source="post: 1094484" data-attributes="member: 6578">Nope. Because it was an extension and due to at signing time he still had 2026 and 2027 remaining on his rookie deal (inclusive of 5th year option)...so while he signed a 4 year contract extension...due to at signing when he did they could spread that bonus money across 5 years instead of four and they did $2.5M voided into 2032. It is a case of where if a team believes this dude is part of the future for sure and he still has a year or two on his rookie deal, just jump at the chance to extend them now and have more years to spread across than wait and not have that luxury.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 1,440 (members: 0, guests: 1,440)