Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1094453" data-attributes="member: 10086">Oh it’s ok I’m just busting your chops.We are all just excited talking football and both passionate about our future. It’s definitely a thought trading Reed.I think he’d bring some good draft capital also. Watson does hold a unique skill set and I’d feel pretty good having Golden and Watson and Savion and signing player “X” through the draft. Plus maybe keeping 1 of Melton or Wicks, just in system guys who stabilize the room.The case for Watson is it’s easier to find an underneath possession Receiver than a True Burner like #9. 17.5 per and he’s sneakily got some varietal of skillsets. He paced 1,023 yards off an ACL. Reed, Doubs and Golden are similarly talented, but no question that Watson can take the top off a Defense and is slightly more dynamic imo.  What can he do in the full spotlight who knows. Also I like the blazing speed factor we have with Golden and Watson. Not all opponents have a pair of 4.3’s boundary CB’s and that = raw separation. The last thing you need as an opponent is Watson or Golden with a yard of separation and the ball in rhythm.I digress. Back to Lukas Van Ness</blockquote>

Total: 869 (members: 5, guests: 864)