Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1094436" data-attributes="member: 10086">Now I like Watson, but for me personally he’s not a player who’s going to ever meet in production his $$ demand. He’s not a 1-trick pony because he does provide a deep threat. Plus he can be a supporting actor and average possession guy when called upon. Yet there’s an old saying, we were looking for a deep threat when we found him and we can be looking again.I truly don’t believe you need to go #34 overall to get what we accomplish with Watson. MVS was a later RD5 prospect. Now I’m not implying it’s a 200% given you get that every top #165 draft selection.  I am suggesting we can draft his replacement now or at least take a stab. There’s a thick WR group and it’s probably one of the better position groups as far as top end and supply into Day 3.MVS already primed was $10mil annual with KC when he left GB. That might be equivalent to $15mil yearly next season. Now if Watson is a 4yr X 75mil I think that’s doable. Anything past $19-20Mil annual (if structured friendly) is a no for me.I do like the idea of a trade, but that depends on the real time status of our Offense. If we’re 5-2 and running hot, I’m likely not trading away players. If we’re 3-4 and stumbling that’s a different story.</blockquote>

Total: 938 (members: 2, guests: 936)