Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 1091309" data-attributes="member: 7261">Good share [USER=6578]@tynimiller[/USER] thanks.  I didn't skip your post, I just didn't soak all of the numbers up. <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/wink.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)" data-shortname=";)" />I also don't think Enagbare is better than LVN and it will be interesting to see what the Packers do in regards to Enagbare.  Good depth guy, but not starter level. Not really pertinent to the discussion, but I would also say that for a 5th rounder, Kingsley has been a better investment than LVN, so far.While I agree with you, [USER=13032]@Heyjoe4[/USER] and a few others that the smart move here would be to try and extend LVN through 2027 or even 2028, I'm not sure that LVN and his agent would do that. I guess it depends on guaranteed money and incentives.I am a firm believer in incentives and this is a perfect example of why they should be incorporated into more contracts.  IF LVN and the Packers are happy with each other, why not sign a deal that keeps him here for 3-4 more seasons. Give him a $5M base salary/season, $5M guaranteed and incentives that either keep him at the $5M (he gets injured and doesn't play) or allows him to reach up to $40M if he suddenly becomes a Pro Bowl player and hits all of his incentive pay levels.</blockquote>

Total: 936 (members: 5, guests: 931)