Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1070087" data-attributes="member: 10086">Lukas Van Ness was always a project. The Kid played 2 years at Iowa. Every scouting report had him highly productive in limited action. He was always going to take 1, maybe 2 years to develop his game.Ok VAN Ness was a high draft section for a guy you likely miss maybe 2 years of high production. I’ll agree with that part, but at no time was he ever expected to hit stride year 1. Year 2 he broke his thumb and played with a cast until week 11?  His hands were already an area he was trying to improve and this didn’t help his ascension. Now we’re seeing the work he put in for 2 seasons begin to blossom. There will still be games he disappears, but they’ll start to become the exception.When Parsons came in everyone said he would make the players around him better. I don’t think it’s a secret that he requires extra attention from opposing Offenses. We all witnessed that theory grow Wings and fly.Van Ness will partly be a benefactor of Micah. Yet he was likely a 6-8 Sacks guy in 2025 without Parsons imo.</blockquote>

Total: 1,543 (members: 2, guests: 1,541)