Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 1001831" data-attributes="member: 7261">Agreed.  Really, the only reason I might want a vet WR, is if the Packers thought it would help in Love's development.  That would take an awfully special vet WR and I really don't know who that would include and at what price.  Still would present what I think is a bigger downside, taking snaps away from guys like Reed, Toure and Wicks.  Not to mention a roster spot, that might lose the Packers DuBose or Heath.  I would prefer to roll with the current group.  If injuries get to them, then maybe a midseason pickup of a vet WR, especially if Love and the offense shock the football world and are playing well.</blockquote>

Total: 921 (members: 1, guests: 920)