Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 6794" data-source="post: 820033">Don't get me wrong I don't like when a referee misses a judgement call in my opinion but with a lot of these calls there's a significant grey area, possibly resulting in you and me disagreeing what the correct call should have been. Therefore another set of eyes taking a look at it doesn't automatically result in the call being any better.While it's possible there's no way of telling the exact location of the ball (that could definitely be changed by using technology) or if a receiver gets both feet in bounds even while reviewing it the rule doesn't leave any room for interpretation, making it an obvious argument for it to be reviewed. The reason it can't be overturned or confirmed in those cases is based on a lack of a perfect camera angle.I just have a hard time believing that it would do any good by allowing to review plays on which even former referees have differing opinions after watching it in slow motion.</blockquote>

Total: 273 (members: 1, guests: 272)