Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 6794" data-source="post: 820000">I don't think the current system is broken therefore don't agree with a need to fix it. It might be possible to improve instant replay with some minor tweaks but overall there's no reason to completely overhaul the process.It seems that the main difference we're having as on how to define judgement calls. In my opinion you wrongfully consider the ball crossing the goal line, a receiver getting both feet in bounds, a player being down by contact to be a judgement call while there are rules in place leaving absolutely no room for interpretation to make a decision. In those cases reviewing the play makes a ton of sense as another set of eyes taking a look at the video is able to make a definite decision.If you allow coaches to challenge calls that by rule leave room for interpretation the only thing you get is another set of eyes taking a look at it and possibly coming up with a different ruling based on their judgement. That doesn't make the decision any better but just different.I really don't like the idea of having someone judge which actions on a play had a direct impact on it to review another judgement call.</blockquote>

Total: 234 (members: 3, guests: 231)