Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2019 NFL Rule Changes That Would Improve The Game Big Time
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mondio" data-source="post: 819665" data-attributes="member: 10441"><p>I only have to look back to last year to know that Replay doesn't really "correct" all that many calls. </p><p></p><p>and if you expand replay to include more challenges, they will use them ESPECIALLY on plays like i just described, as big plays or potential big yardage plays can be the difference between winning and loosing. If they're letting OT's hold more than normal and it's being called both ways, i'm fine with it. I'm not fine with it if suddenly they throw a flag, review it and decide like they did on the field, because if they do that, what's the point. and if they do overturn it and call a holding, then why was that one any different than the others they let go? </p><p></p><p>These refs don't see everything, but they also don't miss a lot. and some games have certain flows and should be left alone. When you see a play like that, and you can see it's offensive holding, but they've been letting that slide all game, but now call it because it was challenged would be silly . You're not really getting calls right, you're just using them to prevent big plays against your or try and get them to benefit you. </p><p></p><p>you're kidding yourself if you don't think every big play wouldn't be scrutinized and challenged at a high rate if they gave them more things to look at. and slowing down every play to look at it, is the very definition of over officiating. </p><p></p><p>I'm more than fine with the rules being more of "guidelines" for officials and knowing that and playing accordingly. I don't need them to replay it and then hold the tape up to the letter of the rule and then decide only on certain plays. and if they're not going to hold it up to the letter of the rule on these judgement calls, then what's the point of replay?</p><p></p><p>"well you see, I know you can see the hold, and I can see the hold, but i don't feel it affected the play and i've been letting that stuff go all game, so i'm not going to call it on replay either" that will go over really well. i'd rather they just don't call it and not be able to replay it. </p><p></p><p>It gets even worse for the hand checking down the field.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mondio, post: 819665, member: 10441"] I only have to look back to last year to know that Replay doesn't really "correct" all that many calls. and if you expand replay to include more challenges, they will use them ESPECIALLY on plays like i just described, as big plays or potential big yardage plays can be the difference between winning and loosing. If they're letting OT's hold more than normal and it's being called both ways, i'm fine with it. I'm not fine with it if suddenly they throw a flag, review it and decide like they did on the field, because if they do that, what's the point. and if they do overturn it and call a holding, then why was that one any different than the others they let go? These refs don't see everything, but they also don't miss a lot. and some games have certain flows and should be left alone. When you see a play like that, and you can see it's offensive holding, but they've been letting that slide all game, but now call it because it was challenged would be silly . You're not really getting calls right, you're just using them to prevent big plays against your or try and get them to benefit you. you're kidding yourself if you don't think every big play wouldn't be scrutinized and challenged at a high rate if they gave them more things to look at. and slowing down every play to look at it, is the very definition of over officiating. I'm more than fine with the rules being more of "guidelines" for officials and knowing that and playing accordingly. I don't need them to replay it and then hold the tape up to the letter of the rule and then decide only on certain plays. and if they're not going to hold it up to the letter of the rule on these judgement calls, then what's the point of replay? "well you see, I know you can see the hold, and I can see the hold, but i don't feel it affected the play and i've been letting that stuff go all game, so i'm not going to call it on replay either" that will go over really well. i'd rather they just don't call it and not be able to replay it. It gets even worse for the hand checking down the field. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: El Guapo
43 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: milani
Today at 5:13 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 12:42 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 11:14 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Off Season News
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 2:18 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2019 NFL Rule Changes That Would Improve The Game Big Time
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
