Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 819015" data-attributes="member: 7261">What I have changed is the fact that the game continues as is. The team getting the ball at the start of the 2nd and 4th quarter isn't given an unfair advantage, they are just continuing play where it left off, why not do that for the 5th quarter?  Why has the game all of a sudden entered the Twilight Zone just because it is tied at the end of the 4th quarter?  Why does it have to be stopped and a coin flip used to restart it?  Why does the first team to score under the parameters of the current rules win, when there is still time on the clock?As far as possessions, that would come into strategy for the team with the ball at the end of the 4th.  However, I guarantee you that you won't see teams kneeling down at the end of the 4th to get to overtime.  To me it would be the most seamless continuation of a game that you could possibly get.How does this favor a ball control running offense?  In your own words, if the defense can't stop them, they don't deserve to win.  You really think a team can chew up 10 minutes of clock time to run the ball and just kick a FG?10 minutes was thrown out there based on trying to limit injuries and playing too long.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 998 (members: 0, guests: 998)