Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 818806" data-attributes="member: 7261">You are correct, most judgement calls/non-calls are just that, refs are required to make a quick split second decision, which they sometimes get wrong due to a number of factors.  As long as a coach isn't given unlimited challenges, he is going to learn only to burn them on calls where that quick judgement looks to be wrong.   This really is no different than a referee judging that a ball crossed the goal line or a receiver had 2 feet in bounds.  If the review isn't conclusive that the wrong call was made, no reversal.  IMO, shouldn't matter if it was a no call or a call.  After all, a runner declared short of the goal line is pretty much a "no call" as well, but can be reversed with a reviewed.Set up a reasonable number of challenges and let the coaches decide how to use them.</blockquote>

Total: 340 (members: 3, guests: 337)