Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="mradtke66" data-source="post: 758831" data-attributes="member: 4199">This article is pretty funky.  The idea that Clark could thrive in a 4-3 at end is laughable.  If we switched to a 4-3, he'd still be the NT, maybe part-time 3-technique.  He'd just spend more time as a 1-tech NT instead of 0.He is right that Lowry isn't really a good fit in a 4-3.  He'd be a run-down, strong side DE, but wouldn't offer much as a pass rusher on the edge.The secondary doesn't matter.  You can play any coverage from either scheme.  Cover 0, 1, 2, 3, and quarters all looks the same, regardless what the front 7 is running.We need another good EDGE player, but we need one regardless.  4-3 or 3-4, we need more guys.  If anything, switching to a 4-3 puts more pressure on us, as we don't have anyone other than Perry who could be a 3-down player.And we don't really have a good weak-side OLB for a 4-3.  Maybe Josh Jones could do it.  Maybe.</blockquote>

Total: 416 (members: 4, guests: 412)