Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 674917" data-attributes="member: 7261"><p>This is the part I keep thinking about.  It makes them worse this year, how much we don't know yet, but it makes them better (cap space wise) for next year.  I don't think it was any secret that we weren't going to be able to resign both Lang and Sitton for 2017 and we would need all the cap space we could get to sign other players as well.  So if it turns out that the Packers get by without Sitton (he also could have gotten injured this year) in 2016, then this move will some day be viewed as pretty good long range planning by the Packers.  Right now though, given who we still have on the OL and that we didn't get anything in exchange,  I think most of us view it as a "wtf is going on" move.</p></blockquote><p></p>

No members online now.

Total: 114 (members: 0, guests: 114)