Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2010 Packers vs 2009 Vikings
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Vikeman" data-source="post: 364449"><p>There's no sense in arguing any of this because I am behind enemy lines...and it's pointless. I can sit here and say 2 + 2 is 4 and they'll be a rack of Packer fans arguing this aint so. There is no way you can clearly say the 2010 Packers are better than the Vikings. The best teams in the NFL are not always the superbowl winners that year. Hence the 97 Packers and the 98 Vikings. So that argument is moot.</p><p> </p><p>Matter of fact scrolling back in this mess of a thread there are so many facts that are wrong and skewed it's not worth arguing. Furthermore I am not trolling...I simply replied to the meathead that said losing Sidney Rice and Chester Taylor was not a big deal. Which is beyond stupid. That statement has nothing to do with the Packers. Like the Packers we were smashed by injuries this year. We were hurt a little bit more and in more important positions. We lost Sidney, our best cover corner, Percy Harvin for half the season, our QB was a cracked fossil, our safties were injured every other weak, and our line was playing injured all year. For someone to say that's not a big deal is retarded. If the Packers were to lose there two starting receivers you go nowhere this year. Nowhere.</p><p> </p><p>And to say Viking fans don't exist outside Minnesota is dumb too. You watch any away game for the Vikings there is a sea of purple. The Vikings have one of the best fanbases around. I am proud to be an out of state Viking fan.</p><p> </p><p>And you can't compare an even loss of players to ours. Us losing Peterson would be a much bigger deal than losing Ryan fricken Grant. Give me a break. Comparing Finley to Shainco is a joke as well. And if you remember we did lose our starting safety and starting linebacker in 2009. So know we didn't and wouldn't finish at the bottom.</p><p> </p><p>I like the chipperness in here now. Considering this place was pretty much a ghost town in 06 07 08 and yes 09. And it had nothing to do with the site being sold. Now you got a bunch of cocky 14 year old noobs that want to bark. I love it...I want more of it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Vikeman, post: 364449"] There's no sense in arguing any of this because I am behind enemy lines...and it's pointless. I can sit here and say 2 + 2 is 4 and they'll be a rack of Packer fans arguing this aint so. There is no way you can clearly say the 2010 Packers are better than the Vikings. The best teams in the NFL are not always the superbowl winners that year. Hence the 97 Packers and the 98 Vikings. So that argument is moot. Matter of fact scrolling back in this mess of a thread there are so many facts that are wrong and skewed it's not worth arguing. Furthermore I am not trolling...I simply replied to the meathead that said losing Sidney Rice and Chester Taylor was not a big deal. Which is beyond stupid. That statement has nothing to do with the Packers. Like the Packers we were smashed by injuries this year. We were hurt a little bit more and in more important positions. We lost Sidney, our best cover corner, Percy Harvin for half the season, our QB was a cracked fossil, our safties were injured every other weak, and our line was playing injured all year. For someone to say that's not a big deal is retarded. If the Packers were to lose there two starting receivers you go nowhere this year. Nowhere. And to say Viking fans don't exist outside Minnesota is dumb too. You watch any away game for the Vikings there is a sea of purple. The Vikings have one of the best fanbases around. I am proud to be an out of state Viking fan. And you can't compare an even loss of players to ours. Us losing Peterson would be a much bigger deal than losing Ryan fricken Grant. Give me a break. Comparing Finley to Shainco is a joke as well. And if you remember we did lose our starting safety and starting linebacker in 2009. So know we didn't and wouldn't finish at the bottom. I like the chipperness in here now. Considering this place was pretty much a ghost town in 06 07 08 and yes 09. And it had nothing to do with the site being sold. Now you got a bunch of cocky 14 year old noobs that want to bark. I love it...I want more of it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Staff online
PikeBadger
Moderator
Members online
ExpatPacker
PikeBadger
Schultz
scheeler
Latest posts
S
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: Schultz
1 minute ago
Draft Talk
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: PikeBadger
44 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Bucks v. Pacers
Latest: weeds
57 minutes ago
Milwaukee Bucks Forum
2024 2nd Rd pick #58 Javon Bullard S
Latest: Thirteen Below
59 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
2024 3rd Rd #91 Ty’Ron Hopper LB
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 12:04 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2010 Packers vs 2009 Vikings
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top