2010 Packers vs 2009 Vikings

[ivo610]

saw on the vikings board the majority thought the 2009 vikings would beat the 2010 packers. What do you guys think?

Vikings Message Board.Com - View topic - 2009 Vikings vs. 2010 Packers

 

[packerswin96]

Doesn't really matter at all, except that the 2010 Packers won the SB, and the 2009 Vikings didn't.

 

[PackersRS]

I think that with these kind of threads it's pretty clear that their fanbase is the worst in the league. That is just pathetic, they're absolutely clueless, and it's not a coincidence that they don't have any SBs. They simply can't recognize reality, and it reflects on the franchise.

That is why I don't respect vikings fans, but do bears fans. Hate them both, but at least I respect the bears fans, they're very aware of the condition of their team.

(there are exceptions, of course)

 

[Aaron rodgers is god]

I would have taken the 2009 packers over the 2009 vikings.

 

[VersusTheMoose]

Yeah that is pretty pathetic, but I am used to Viking fans absolutely embarrassing themselves by now.

 

[GBPack2010]

LOL championships determine a team's success during a season. Who the hell wants to play for a team that lost the NFC Championship on a terrible decision to throw late in the game?

 

[ivo610]

At least they are being realistic about next season, most say they think 6 wins would be a reach.

They should absolutely tank next season and get Luck

 

[YouFrgotPoland]

Obviously we all are a bit biased about how much Vikings fans suck, at least more than fans of teams in other divisions. But I do wonder if anyone knows of these kind of reports from fans of any of those other teams, cuz Vikings fans in my experience really are just bad people lol....

One guy I know is still convinced that the Vikes just threw the second game this past season because they wanted to get Chilly fired...

 

[Green_Bay_Packers]

HAHAHA There all funny on that board

A few of them look like they have sense

 

[Kitten]

Grasping at straws.... They are probably just looking for something, anything, to make them feel better. They've had some rotten luck this year and next year, probably the next several years, don't look that much better for them. Do we kick them while they are down? Well, to be honest, I can't name a better time to kick them. :haha:

 

[greenandgold]

Do we kick them while they are down? Well, to be honest, I can't name a better time to kick them. :haha:

Yep, that is the best time to kick them. Hard to kick them if your team is the one sucking.

Fortunately, that weren't the case this year. :happy0005:

 

[greenandgold]

I would have taken the 2009 packers over the 2009 vikings.

I wouldn't. We had two shots at them that year, they beat us both times.

Of course, I remember the year we beat them twice in the regular season, only to have them beat the Packers in post season, so who knows?

 

[Big E]

That's one of the funniest things I've read in a long time

 

[GreenBayGal]

Grasping at straws.... They are probably just looking for something, anything, to make them feel better. They've had some rotten luck this year and next year, probably the next several years, don't look that much better for them. Do we kick them while they are down? Well, to be honest, I can't name a better time to kick them. :haha:

That's the only way we CAN kick them. Maybe if they learned how to play football they wouldn't always suck and then we could kick them on a different level. :viksux:

 

[GreenBayGal]

They're just trying to feel better about signing our rejects.

 

[Darth Garfunkel]

I love those kind of pointless, speculative comparisons.
It may as well be "Who would win a fist-fight, Darth Vader or the Terminator?"

 

[Wood Chipper]

I would take the 96 and 97 Packers over any Vikings team too, while we are making dumb hypothetical fights.

 

[ivo610]

I love those kind of pointless, speculative comparisons.
It may as well be "Who would win a fist-fight, Darth Vader or the Terminator?"

terminator

 

[greenandgold]

terminator

Give me odds on Vader?

 

[Arod2gjdd]

Doesn't really matter at all, except that the 2010 Packers won the SB, and the 2009 Vikings didn't.

this

 

[cheesehurdler]

Which team won the Super Bowl? Exactly.

Although, technically, by that logic, you can say that the 2010 Green Bay Packers are better than every Minnesota Vikings football team ever existed, even the 1998 Minnesota Vikings, since the Vikings never won the Super Bowl... which I'm fine with.

 

[FrankRizzo]

The 2009 Vikings were the best team in the NFL last year, but their QB, in the end, threw the Super Bowl away.
Just like the ****** did for the Packers in 2008 & 2004.

The best team rarely wins the Super Bowl, and Super Bowls are the bottom line.

 

[buckshotrob]

The 2009 Vikings were the best team in the NFL last year, but their QB, in the end, threw the Super Bowl away.
Just like the ****** did for the Packers in 2008 & 2004.

The best team rarely wins the Super Bowl, and Super Bowls are the bottom line.

hold up i kno farves a choke artist but we was the best team in football this year if we were healthy it would have been 16-0 cant no body beat us we top dogs in this game

 

[VBJunkie]

Doesn't really matter at all, except that the 2010 Packers won the SB, and the 2009 Vikings didn't.

Exactly what I was going to post...

:viksux:

 

[FrankRizzo]

Remember in 2009 when Benedict called his Vikings team the most talented team he'd ever been on?
Well, he may have been right, and they should have gone to the Super Bowl.... but he did what he often did: he threw it all away at the very end. How perfectly fitting.

Then this year, we swept their a***s and he's not a footnote, while our good guy is something he never ever was: Super Bowl MVP. That's gotta burn the old man up!