Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Clev44" data-source="post: 608036" data-attributes="member: 10774"><p>Our definitions of great must be different. I would say he was an adequate starter, but didn't make many game changing plays to be considered great in my eyes. Hopefully Clinton Dix helps him to be better, more reliable partner then what he was working with.  Burnett is good against the run, but always a step behind in coverage. And like I said 2 turnovers forced in 2 years is far below his college production, he was labeled as a turnover machine and ball hawk coming out of college, that hasn't translated yet.</p></blockquote><p></p>

No members online now.

Total: 54 (members: 0, guests: 54)