Recent content by Mel-MinAlum

The Stokes pick is a position of need and a preemptive move in the event we lose Zaire to FA when his contract is up. I would have preferred the Notre Dame LB but the pick makes sense in the present and future.

Rondale Moore

A bookend tackle that can learn from Clifton, Driver's eventual successor with bonus return ability, a RB to groom for when Grant is gone with size, speed, hands, and the strength to block. TT's dynasty vision has gotten very clear to me and we still have six picks left.

This pick is vintage TT sticking to his MO of drafting for the future.

I'm about mocked out, and frankly ones that don't project trades don't interest me at this point. But just so you know I did look it over, pick #87 to the Colts should be Marcus Gilchrist from Clemson. Marcus Gilbert is a tackle from Florida.

Mikel Leshoure

Nope, I'm there with ya on that one. Same with Dontay Moch at 64....sorry I'm getting off topic.

This year's OT/OG class seems to be pretty deep with potential solid starters beyond the first round, and pretty shallow on potential All-Pros. If TT stands pat at 32 and sticks to his BPA philosophy, I think there will be players at other positions higher on his board than what is available for...

IMO, This is another area where the lack of a CBA being in place is going to effect decision making. If the forced mediation doesn't get it done in the next two weeks, teams will have no idea exactly which players they will lose or retain, they don't know who from other teams they may be able to...

Well, now that we have it narrowed down......JK. Nice job. It does appear that there was a bit of an emphasis on offense (WR/RB) at the combine, which is just an observation and means absolutely nothing....or does it???? Sometimes I wish I was more of a basketball fan so I wouldn't drive myself...

Is there a specific player(s) those of you who are talking about trading up are thinking of? Obviously there are limitless scenarios that could factor in, but there must be some names out there you're thinking of. I am only basing my next statement on the who knows how many mocks I've looked...

You saw the part where I said I was fine with moving up to get someone right? And where did I say this is not a deep draft class? In truth I think this draft is pretty deep at a couple of positions I would like to see us draft, which is why I think we can trade down and get better if the price...

Good stuff there ThxJack. This pre-draft scenarioizing (new word I just came up with) is awesome.

It was brought up in the Trade# 32 thread that some people are of the mind set that doing everything possible to obtain first thru fourth round picks in this year's draft is critical to the Packer's short term success. I can only assume this means trading picks in future drafts and/or current...

That's all I'm doing is stating an opinion as well PFC. As a matter of fact trading opinions with other fans is one of the funnest parts of this time of year. Actually I am curious how many are of that frame of mind, so I will ask the question in a new thread.