Recent content by Big Dan

. <---------- (ahem)

That thread over there certainly was entertaining.

Good job, Tom, and thanks in advance for finding a stream for the guys and girls that won't be able to get the game on tv. Sometimes ya just gotta love the internets. I'll get it on tv, but am not nearly tech savvy enough to find a stream for the others.

A lot would depend on what systems my coaches were going to run. Since I like MM's offense and Capers' defense, I'll assume my team will be running those. Aaaron Rodgers Adrian Peterson Clay Matthews Suh Revis Suh, Revis, and Peterson are locks no matter what. Matthews is a lock in a 3-4, but...

I can't call it. It's all very close. I tend to I think I'd still take the '96 crew though. Another way to look at it would be that if you took the 4 receivers from 2010 and put them with Favre in '96, I think production would have been less over all. Jennings would be an absolute monster no...

That's where we differ. Over all I'd rank them: Jennings Brooks Driver Freeman Rison Jones Bebe Nelson Rison over Jones, and Bebe over Nelson are based purely on consistency. I think that's really important in the 3 & 4 spots. If Jones and Nelson can become more consistent I'd go Jones, Nelson...

I'm not sure about that part. Jennings is the best of the bunch as a deep threat, but Freeman was no slouch by any means. I love Driver, but Robert Brooks was the best over-the-middle receiver I ever saw. He was absolutely monstrous in YAC, turning a lot of those quick slants into big gains...

I'm not a big believer in the power rankings posted on various sites like Fox Sports, SI, ESPN, but I keep checking them every week just waiting for Detroit to rank higher than Minnesota.

Kitten, We may be a little leary because of what happened with Mike Holmgren. Imagine what could have been if Mike Holmgren hadn't gotten the big-head and wanted to be both HC & GM. His coaching and Ron Wolf's personnel management could have turned the Packers of the late 90's into a dynasty of...

Wow. That's some seriously in-depth analysis. Like Croak, I didn't know a lot about the Falcons, but now I feel like I'll have a better handle on what they're trying to do on Sunday, which will make watching the game much more enjoyable. Thanks!

Nice.

Here in Wisconsin, we get a lot of it because they're a division rival on top of all the drama. We also seem to get updates whenever Favre farts.

I tend to agree. Vegas has Atlanta by 3. Home field is an automatic 3, so they seem to feel the 2 teams are equal, or very close to it. If we play like we did for the final 3 quarters of Sunday's game, we should be in really good shape. I think we can indeed play at that level, or very close to...

Nah, Murgen, we just can't do it. I kinda like the guy. Although I did tell him that if Atlanta wins I'm going to kick him in the nuts.

10-4