I agree both Perry and Worthy are potential busts but both have incredible potential IMO. Both will have to be very coachable and both may need motivational "pushing". But both are physical specimens and that, along with trusting the coaching staff, in this case Greene and Trgo, is why I was very happy with both picks.
At least the article linked recognized the importance of the nickel formation. I don't know the percentage off-hand but Capers played nickel and dime, with just two DL, on a significant majority of the plays. That's where Worthy should shine, probably teamed mostly with Raji as one of the two DL. In the base he will have to "sacrifice" for the team because the job of the DL is usually to take on blockers to free up the LBs. Even if Perry struggles in coverage at OLB, I think both rookies should excel rushing the passer.
I've heard a couple of national "experts" on the radio say Worthy and Daniels aren't suited for the Packers D, ignoring the frequency Capers plays other than base D. On the Score radio (Bears' station) I heard someone from the Natonal Football Post site in analyzing the division say something like 'Perry is a one-trick pony - all he can do is try to beat the OT to the outside and Worthy can play the run but can't rush the QB'. He did like the Hayward pick though. I didn't hear the beginning of the segment so I didn't catch the guy's name but I do respect that site. BTW, he liked the Bears and Vikings draft but really didn't like the Lions' draft.
It was kind of funny listening to the Score before the draft because a few of their hosts talked as if the new Bears' GM Phil Emery was a drafting genius. To be fair that may be because of how bad his predecessor was (boy, do I miss ole Jerry!), because they described his drafting theory as always picking "safe" players - not high "ceilings" but not "low floors". While a couple of the hosts thought Emery's picks were riskier, they were pretty disheartened after the draft.