Why didn't we trade for Marshawn Lynch again?

Discussion in 'Packer Fan Forum' started by Rodgers2Finley4TDs, Jan 8, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. 13 Times Champs Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jul 24, 2011
    Message Count:
    2,904
    Location:
    Virginia
    Ratings Received:
    +835 / 44 / -5
    Packer Fan Since:
    1960
    No I don't think we can win a Super Bowl with last years defense. I do think we can win one with last years offense.:)
  2. Mr Pickle Guest

    Member Since:
    Message Count:
    0
    Ratings Received:
    +9 / 3 / -0
    Did you watch the game? Did you not see how Jacobs ran over us at the end of the game? What was the Pack's total rushing yards I don't quite remember. Tell me could you? Was it over 70?
  3. Mr Pickle Guest

    Member Since:
    Message Count:
    0
    Ratings Received:
    +9 / 3 / -0
    Agreed. I Just looking to take the pressure OFF Rodgers. There is to much (as in Favres later years) on Rodgers to domit all....:tup:
  4. 60six DIE HARD

    Member Since:
    Jun 1, 2006
    Message Count:
    177
    Location:
    Chicago
    Ratings Received:
    +42 / 1 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    1966
    So you think Lynch is/was the answer ? Answer to what, the SB win or the 15-1 season.
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • 13 Times Champs Cheesehead

      Member Since:
      Jul 24, 2011
      Message Count:
      2,904
      Location:
      Virginia
      Ratings Received:
      +835 / 44 / -5
      Packer Fan Since:
      1960
      Yes it was 109. I tire of you goodnight.
    • Mr Pickle Guest

      Member Since:
      Message Count:
      0
      Ratings Received:
      +9 / 3 / -0
      :tup:
    • Mr Pickle Guest

      Member Since:
      Message Count:
      0
      Ratings Received:
      +9 / 3 / -0
      Maybe 'one day' we could have an intelligent Packer conversation, GO KUHN!!!!
    • Mr Pickle Guest

      Member Since:
      Message Count:
      0
      Ratings Received:
      +9 / 3 / -0
      Goodnite dude
    • Mr Pickle Guest

      Member Since:
      Message Count:
      0
      Ratings Received:
      +9 / 3 / -0
      Lynch.... no, but a respectable back...
    • ivo610 Cheesehead

      Member Since:
      Feb 13, 2010
      Message Count:
      13,535
      Location:
      Madison
      Ratings Received:
      +2,848 / 62 / -10
      Whats a well rounded offense going to get us?

      Due to Salary cap you cant have a stud player at every position. You have to pick and choose. This isnt madden or your fantasy football team.

      On top of the salary issue you have the issue of the O line. You either get an O line that pass blocks well or that run blocks well. Very Very difficult to get both.
    • Mr Pickle Guest

      Member Since:
      Message Count:
      0
      Ratings Received:
      +9 / 3 / -0
      Remember Andre..... 97.... did he help?
    • Mr Pickle Guest

      Member Since:
      Message Count:
      0
      Ratings Received:
      +9 / 3 / -0
      'Jones' could GO.... no? I agree with you but we are reciever heavy...
    • ivo610 Cheesehead

      Member Since:
      Feb 13, 2010
      Message Count:
      13,535
      Location:
      Madison
      Ratings Received:
      +2,848 / 62 / -10
      Where would you propose we find said back?

      Where would you propose we get the money to pay said back?

      Where would you propose we get the O line for him to run behind?

      If teams keep winning the SB with little to no running game why would we want to go backwards? Running the ball is more or less dead in todays NFL as it correlates with winning. Hey Jacksonville and Minnesota.
      • Agree Agree x 1
      • AmishMafia There's cheese under that hat

        Member Since:
        Sep 27, 2010
        Message Count:
        1,479
        Location:
        The heart of Amish Country, Las Vegas, NV
        Ratings Received:
        +941 / 22 / -2
        You sound like you are familiar with football but you can't be seriously suggesting that the Packer plan is to have NO run game? You think TT will cut all RBs and MM will have Rodgers pass every play? Dude, that's not realistic.
      • Mr Pickle Guest

        Member Since:
        Message Count:
        0
        Ratings Received:
        +9 / 3 / -0
        What about Driver... don't get me wrong, I love loyalty. But it is a business.... would we miss him?
      • Mr Pickle Guest

        Member Since:
        Message Count:
        0
        Ratings Received:
        +9 / 3 / -0
        Ok?:tup:
      • ivo610 Cheesehead

        Member Since:
        Feb 13, 2010
        Message Count:
        13,535
        Location:
        Madison
        Ratings Received:
        +2,848 / 62 / -10
        WR heavy is what got us a title and 15 -1... but sure lets dump Jones as he doesnt have a lot longer on his contract. This year Jones is getting paid 2.5 mil.... only 5.5 mil to go before we get ourselves a matt forte
      • Mr Pickle Guest

        Member Since:
        Message Count:
        0
        Ratings Received:
        +9 / 3 / -0
        WRONG!!!!!
      • Mr Pickle Guest

        Member Since:
        Message Count:
        0
        Ratings Received:
        +9 / 3 / -0
        KUHN will take us from the 5...... All you believers of Starks and Kuhn... I hope you're right when we are facing 3 and 9 3/4's of the time...
      • ivo610 Cheesehead

        Member Since:
        Feb 13, 2010
        Message Count:
        13,535
        Location:
        Madison
        Ratings Received:
        +2,848 / 62 / -10
        well his contract is more or less guaranteed so he is staying (disagree with TT on that but watev)

        So cut 2 WRs... you get the money for a RB.... I mean the offense wont be as good but fair enough.

        Now how do you propose we find this runningback?
      • Mr Pickle Guest

        Member Since:
        Message Count:
        0
        Ratings Received:
        +9 / 3 / -0
        Don't forget Driver.... $$$
      • Mr Pickle Guest

        Member Since:
        Message Count:
        0
        Ratings Received:
        +9 / 3 / -0
        That much closer:sneaky:
      • ivo610 Cheesehead

        Member Since:
        Feb 13, 2010
        Message Count:
        13,535
        Location:
        Madison
        Ratings Received:
        +2,848 / 62 / -10
        No I believe in Rodgers in short situations. 5 wide with the option for Rodgers to get the first with his feet if the play breaks down.

        I dont recall the offense having this issue last season.... does anyone else?
      • Mr Pickle Guest

        Member Since:
        Message Count:
        0
        Ratings Received:
        +9 / 3 / -0
        Yea... NFL defenses can't see that coming... having no option.... PUT it all on Rodgers... Even Montana couldn't do that....
      • Mr Pickle Guest

        Member Since:
        Message Count:
        0
        Ratings Received:
        +9 / 3 / -0
        Fan Base???
      Thread Status:
      Not open for further replies.

      Share This Page