1. Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!
    Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers.

    You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user.

    Sign Up/a> or Log In

    Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions. Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member! Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member!

Who would you like to have returning punts?

Discussion in 'Packer Fan Forum' started by musccy, Aug 31, 2005.

?

Who would you like to be the Packers pr?

  1. Peter Warrick

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. Terrence Murphy

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. Andrae Thurman

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. Antonio Chatman

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  5. other

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. musccy
    Offline

    musccy Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Messages:
    1,854
    Location:
    Lynchburg, VA
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0
    Here are a few names that have been thrown around lately.
  2. digsthepack
    Offline

    digsthepack Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Messages:
    2,486
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Peter Warrick? Last I heard, he was not on the team, and I do not buy into the notion that he will be any time soon.

    That being said, Terrence Murphy when he gets healthy.
  3. musccy
    Offline

    musccy Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Messages:
    1,854
    Location:
    Lynchburg, VA
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0
    I just threw him out there because there have been some rumblings on talkradio, message boards, and the news about TT showing interest in him (although last I heard, he was checking out seattle).
  4. NCPackerfan
    Offline

    NCPackerfan Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2004
    Messages:
    203
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    I voted for Chatman by default. We have yet to see what Murphy can do because of injuries. I think Chatman's done a servicable job in that role the last few years. The thing I like about him is that he doesn't put the ball on the turf. I've also felt like he's never had adequate blocking.
  5. rabidgopher04
    Offline

    rabidgopher04 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Messages:
    1,467
    Location:
    Boston, MA
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Wouldn't Warrick want more money than a 4th string WR would get anyway?
  6. FL Packer
    Offline

    FL Packer Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2005
    Messages:
    9
    Location:
    St Petersburg, FL
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Chatman is the only choice. Murphy has no experience returning punts...why would anyone select him!?!? Warrick would be a high price PR because we don't need him as a WR. I agree with an earlier post...Chatman fields the ball well, doesn't fumble and hasn't had adequate blocking.
  7. Buckeyepackfan
    Offline

    Buckeyepackfan Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2005
    Messages:
    804
    Location:
    Lima, Ohio
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    I have never understood why this subject keeps coming up since Chapman has had the job. Earlier posters are correct, Antonio has never had great blocking when it comes to our punt return team, I think I am right in saying he has never fumbled and has muffed only one punt since he has been the man.

    Give me a guy who is going to hold onto the ball, then start finding people who will hustle and block for him, any return yards he gets is gravy.
  8. Bobby Roberts
    Offline

    Bobby Roberts Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2005
    Messages:
    770
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Agreed!!

    Considering the conditions that GB plays in from Nov - Jan, you must have a sure handed punt returner! Chatman has proven to be that.

    As for being able to take it the distance, Chatman hasn't had a chance. I'm positive that Rossum couldn't do any better with the blocking that we've had in the last couple years.

    The job is Chatman's until he gets injured or someone better comes along. We have too many other needs to be concerned about fixing something that isn't broken.
  9. digsthepack
    Offline

    digsthepack Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Messages:
    2,486
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Actually, it is my understanding the Murphy excelled at return duties in college.
  10. Bobby Roberts
    Offline

    Bobby Roberts Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2005
    Messages:
    770
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    He still has to prove that he can do it well with the type of blocking GB has provided (not much) and do it no matter what the weather. Murphy could have competed for the job, but he's been injured too much.

    Most likely he won't get a chance to battle for the job until next year. Of course if he gets healthy, he could battle out for returning kick-offs in order to limit Fergie's ST time.
  11. PWT36
    Offline

    PWT36 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2005
    Messages:
    895
    Location:
    De pere, Wi.
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Murphy was a kick off returner in college, however he received a little practice returning punts earlier in training camp, but was having trouble catching the ball. If Chatman is ready after the neck injury he received in last week's game against the Pats, the job as punt returner is most like his for the reasons some of you posted in this topic. He also really made himself pretty good wide receiver over the last year or so. Favre is not afraid to throw to him.
  12. Zero2Cool
    Offline

    Zero2Cool Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2004
    Messages:
    11,902
    Location:
    Green Bay, WI
    Ratings:
    +7 / 1 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    1989
  13. HatestheEagles084
    Offline

    HatestheEagles084 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2005
    Messages:
    1,423
    Location:
    Allentown, PA
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0
    chatman...just because of his fundamental skill...sure, i'd love to have a dante hall back there for us who can break it open, but with our offense, someone who can just CATCH THE BALL and not give it away, which chatman is solid at is something we need, i'm sure davenport and some others will get chances on kick returns, but punt returns i pick the incumbent
  14. CalifPacker
    Offline

    CalifPacker Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2005
    Messages:
    757
    Location:
    California Gold
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0
    I voted for Chatman but would like to see Murphy get a shot at it when he gets back on the field.
  15. PackerTraxx
    Offline

    PackerTraxx Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2005
    Messages:
    1,028
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Of those I would also have to go with Chatman. He is good from a conservative standpoint in that he has sure hands and doesn't fumble.However, a good share of that is because he backs off a lot of balls with the defense bearing down on him and the ball rolls another 20+ yards. Also, he calls for a fair catch quite often when there is 10+ yards of space. In addition, he seldom makes the first man miss,which good returners do most of the time.

    I was hoping Bragg would be an upgrade this year, but it doesn't look like it.
  16. Ryan
    Offline

    Ryan Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2004
    Messages:
    3,371
    Location:
    Omaha, NE
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0
    ***Warning Madden '06 Reference to Follow***

    He's not so hot in the game :p
  17. Obi1
    Offline

    Obi1 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2005
    Messages:
    1,110
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    1. Willie Wood
    2. Desmond Howard
    3. Steve Odom

    Actually, without getting TOO silly, I think it matters little who returns punts at this time... Their blocking is horrible.

Share This Page