When Woodson comes back, T. Williams should be benched...

Discussion in 'Packer Fan Forum' started by Mr. StyleZ, Dec 30, 2012.

  1. GreenBlood Banned

    Member Since:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Message Count:
    1,705
    Ratings Received:
    +660 / 41 / -3
    Easy to say from the sidelines.
  2. HyponGrey Caseus Locutus Est

    Member Since:
    Mar 18, 2012
    Message Count:
    2,511
    Location:
    Mount Laurel, New Jersey
    Ratings Received:
    +690 / 35 / -2
    Packer Fan Since:
    1998
    He's still our best cover man, but he is our worst tackling CB
  3. Mr. StyleZ Banned

    Member Since:
    Jan 11, 2010
    Message Count:
    1,760
    Location:
    Mayville, WI
    Ratings Received:
    +376 / 4 / -0
    No. No, not really. Has nothing to do with his INT count lol. Not really, if he was, he'd be there.
  4. FrankRizzo Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    May 2, 2010
    Message Count:
    4,226
    Location:
    Dallas
    Ratings Received:
    +994 / 22 / -3
    Who on the bench is a better tackler than Williams, at CB?

    I expect (hope) that Woodson is back Saturday. Hope he was able to somehow add some bulk around that collar bone.
    Peterson could crack it on his first tackle attempt of him.
  5. P-E-Z Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 20, 2011
    Message Count:
    191
    Ratings Received:
    +32 / 4 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    2009
    Between the idiotic penalty on the off side of the play and the play where he could have blocked the hole Peterson was coming he was the difference maker, for the Vikings...... :(
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Einstein McFly Cheesehead

      Member Since:
      Jun 15, 2012
      Message Count:
      64
      Ratings Received:
      +22 / 2 / -0
      Packer Fan Since:
      1988
      He's our best cover corner guys. He is. That's why he's always on the best receiver. Whoever said "trade him" will change their tune if they get rid of him and we get lit up over and over.

      That said, he clearly doesn't want to tackle AP and the vikes don't have any receivers that would make it off our practice squad, so I'd be fine with them putting Woodson in (provided that he will hit the way he always has) or House (if healthy) or even Jarrett Bush who is always willing to hit. We need 12 guys on the field to bottle up AP, so trying to do it with ten won't work.
    • 13 Times Champs Cheesehead

      Member Since:
      Jul 24, 2011
      Message Count:
      2,904
      Location:
      Virginia
      Ratings Received:
      +835 / 44 / -5
      Packer Fan Since:
      1960
      I don't think his problem is injury related, he needs to grow a bigger set.
      • Agree Agree x 1
      • HyponGrey Caseus Locutus Est

        Member Since:
        Mar 18, 2012
        Message Count:
        2,511
        Location:
        Mount Laurel, New Jersey
        Ratings Received:
        +690 / 35 / -2
        Packer Fan Since:
        1998
        Bush, House?
      • FrankRizzo Cheesehead

        Member Since:
        May 2, 2010
        Message Count:
        4,226
        Location:
        Dallas
        Ratings Received:
        +994 / 22 / -3
        Bush is. House is not... he's soft & frail too... and always hurt.
      • Vltrophy Cheesehead

        Member Since:
        Feb 4, 2012
        Message Count:
        2,666
        Ratings Received:
        +270 / 26 / -0
        Packer Fan Since:
        1996
        Tramon wasn't the only reason we lost but that penalty sure didn't help any. Our D MUST step it up. Of course those blown calls didn't help us out either
      • Harrison McCaslin Cheesehead

        Member Since:
        Dec 31, 2012
        Message Count:
        26
        Location:
        Dallas, Texas
        Ratings Received:
        +5 / 0 / -0
        Packer Fan Since:
        1994
        You're right, I mixed up Jennings and Burnett. I apologize!
        But we have to realize, Williams is a good corner.
        But I do agree, he needs to freaking tackle. Haha.
      • mor4les Cheesehead

        Member Since:
        Jan 15, 2008
        Message Count:
        124
        Location:
        Madrid
        Ratings Received:
        +40 / 1 / -0
        IMO he should have a limited role against the Vikings, use Woodson in the box, Shields and Hayward in the outside and Tramon in the slot in the nickel formation. The only game we could really use him is at Atlanta vs Juilio Jones, or if we make it to the SB vs Andre Johnson both games with help from the safety
      • HyponGrey Caseus Locutus Est

        Member Since:
        Mar 18, 2012
        Message Count:
        2,511
        Location:
        Mount Laurel, New Jersey
        Ratings Received:
        +690 / 35 / -2
        Packer Fan Since:
        1998
        Nah, not in the slot. You can move Hayward to the outside with Wood in the slot or vice versa, stick Bush in for Tramon or at FS. Plenty of other more optimal options
      • mradtke66 Cheesehead

        Member Since:
        Feb 9, 2011
        Message Count:
        295
        Location:
        Madison, WI
        Ratings Received:
        +72 / 6 / -0
        Yeah, Tramon at the slot is a terrible idea. The nickel has to make more tackles, not fewer. You want to make a statement to Tramon, start Hayward and Shields at corner. Keep Woodson at safety. Bring the Woodson into the box. When they go nickel, kick Hayward to the slot, Tramon in his usual spot.

        Nothing will wake up a vet like losing a start to a rookie because you won't tackle.
      • gatorpack Cheesehead

        Member Since:
        Oct 26, 2010
        Message Count:
        451
        Location:
        Florida
        Ratings Received:
        +52 / 8 / -1
        Whatever we do im sure we will have woodson in postion to help against the run and thats a good thing.
      • HyponGrey Caseus Locutus Est

        Member Since:
        Mar 18, 2012
        Message Count:
        2,511
        Location:
        Mount Laurel, New Jersey
        Ratings Received:
        +690 / 35 / -2
        Packer Fan Since:
        1998
        Whitt compares Shields' year to Tramon's in 2010, calls Shields the best tackling CB we have. Also says CB position in competition and Tramon not guaranteed starting spot.
      • bozz_2006 Cheesehead

        Member Since:
        Mar 24, 2006
        Message Count:
        4,425
        Location:
        Grand Forks, ND
        Ratings Received:
        +550 / 3 / -0
        Shields, the man who was benched because he couldn't tackle. Our best tackling CB, ladies and gentlemen...
      • ivo610 Cheesehead

        Member Since:
        Feb 13, 2010
        Message Count:
        13,535
        Location:
        Madison
        Ratings Received:
        +2,848 / 62 / -10
        No where near a pro bowl corner. 2010 he was but that was a long time and steep decline ago.

        He constantly gets torched by #1 WRs. He is a weak point on the defense.
      • ivo610 Cheesehead

        Member Since:
        Feb 13, 2010
        Message Count:
        13,535
        Location:
        Madison
        Ratings Received:
        +2,848 / 62 / -10
        I question anyone's football knowledge if they think next season 37 yr old should be our #1 corner. Dear god that's such an idiotic thought. People must only see the name on the jersey. Should driver be our #1 WR too?
      • HyponGrey Caseus Locutus Est

        Member Since:
        Mar 18, 2012
        Message Count:
        2,511
        Location:
        Mount Laurel, New Jersey
        Ratings Received:
        +690 / 35 / -2
        Packer Fan Since:
        1998
        Shows what a little hard work and an entire offseason devoted to nothing but improving tackling can do.
        Regression and injury on the part of your peers may also help

      Share This Page