I feel the players don't fit the stereotype for the guys we tend to target. As you said, there isn't enough value to draft a WR in the 1, Randle needs to add 15 lbs and play with the same physicality he did last year, Williams is the complete opposite of what we look for in a TE. Jones, McCray, and Hansen fit, but 2 IOL when brass likes EDS, who will probably get tendered, and Lang? It doesn't feel right.I wouldn't go WR with the first pick however to get a great WR and then have Jones still there in the 2nd sets up a great draft. I loved some of the other choices and liked others...but I didn't feel there was a waste of a pick in them. Do you not like the picks or do you feel it isn't BPA which is our MO.
I feel the players don't fit the stereotype for the guys we tend to target. As you said, there isn't enough value to draft a WR in the 1, Randle needs to add 15 lbs and play with the same physicality he did last year, Williams is the complete opposite of what we look for in a TE. Jones, McCray, and Hansen fit, but 2 IOL when brass likes EDS, who will probably get tendered, and Lang? It doesn't feel right.
I'm still a BPA policy supporter. If the best available at our pick is a CB, so be it. We take him and smile.It seems you have it pegged about right by my thinking Amish. I wouldn't be upset with any of the first three needs. I'd prefer a DT/DE over a Center over a MLB as I think there might be some depth later for those.
I prefer a DT over a DE as I'd like to see some beef in there as Pickett's replacement
I think that MLB may become a strength. I'm still banking on Manning making a difference. TT traded up for him and I think they might see something there. What a homer hey?
I'd like to see a safety along with the possible CB depth as well. It would be nice if Richardson becomes a run force at safety also. He has the tools and the makeup to do it. I do believe there will be at least one OLB taken.
What's exciting is that the Packers can go so many different ways. I bet nobody comes even close to the actual picks. It's just as likely they pick a WR in the 2nd than a C or MLB.
Yes, BPA always, if you think the BPA is better than what you have, it makes sense to grab him. That's what makes the draft so exciting.I'm still a BPA policy supporter. If the best available at our pick is a CB, so be it. We take him and smile.
I agree with Manning. He overcame a lot without complaining or using it as an excuse. To do what he did tells me the kid has a lot of guts and fortitude - he could very well step to the plate this year.
I'm still a BPA policy supporter. If the best available at our pick is a CB, so be it. We take him and smile.
I agree with Manning. He overcame a lot without complaining or using it as an excuse. To do what he did tells me the kid has a lot of guts and fortitude - he could very well step to the plate this year.
Josh Alper said:Jovan Olafioye was named the best offensive lineman in the CFL this season, raising his profile and helping him get a look from NFL teams for the second straight season.
For the second straight season, medical issues have kept him from landing a contract. Olafioye was turned down by the Packers’ medical staff after they evaluated his medical records. At issue is medication Olafioye takes because of a family disposition toward high blood pressure, according to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. Olafioye actually signed a contract with the Rams last year before getting dinged in the physical because, per Olafioye, he’d stopped taking his medication.
The good news is that Olafioye has other suitors. He says the Ravens and Steelers are among a half-dozen teams with interest and he also said that the Packers doctors thought that he’d wind up landing with an NFL team willing to take a bigger risk than they’re willing to take in Green Bay.
“They’re sure I’ll be playing for somebody in the NFL this year,” said Olafioye. “That was encouraging. They said my situation is controllable but they didn’t want to take that risk. With their rules they can’t mess with my situation.”
Given all the interest in CFL pass rushers, it makes sense that there would also be interest in guys that have been able to stop them. Now Olafioye just needs to find a way to convince someone his situation is worth messing with.
If Jonathan Jenkins fell to Packers at #26, do you think we should take him? Several mocks have us taking him there over players like Jonathan Cooper and Kevin Minter.
I'd like to see us get a real ILB like Minter or Ogletree or a guy who can take over at C, but Jenkins would be a helluva replacement for Pickett.
I bet simon has the better rookie season -_-
That's actually my ideal pick. I'm not sure whether or not he will make it down to us. There's this guy, who I think we could target sometime in the 3rd round.
You must be logged in to see this image or video!
Eagles 34 is official.
Jenkins did all that at the Senior Bowl with what was considered a "sloppy body".
Eifert over Ertz, and even Escobar over Ertz if we consider system.
IMO, there is no reason to dump Finley. He's still a plus guy at TE, even if he's not worth what they're paying him. In the worst case, they can get some kind of draft pick for him, but I just don't see it. Guys like Kuhn, TWilliams, Woodson will be gone (or in Wood's case, restructured) first, if we enter an exodus for cap reasons.
However, a second viable TE and a player we can develop for the future is nothing to squawk at... I'm not much of a fan of Ertz in the first though.
They already saw him in skives on the scale at the Senior Bowl weigh in. I heard scouts were disappointed until he took the field and blew them all away. Your last sentence is unfortunately correct."Sloppy body" is relative. 6'3", 360lb. football players are basically sumo wrestlers in miniature. I've read he's less sloppy than one might expect. Scouts will have a better idea when he strips to shorts and gets on the scale at the Combine. On the other hand, if he's at one of those Combine prep training centers and shows up at 340 lbs. and lifts like one would expect, he'll be out of reach.