We just traded again #93 To Saint Louis

[Chamuko]

Still no info on what we got... Maybe a couple of late rounders.... I dont know I just dont like this last trade, either TT is a freeaking jenious and knows a lot more than most of the people on the NFL or we are letting talent go away in order to get more bodies... quantity over quality ???

 

[all about da packers]

Chamuko, check your PM.

 

[all about da packers]

Packers get picks number 109 (4th round) and 183 (6th round).

 

[PackOne]

Maybe we will end up with 23 7th rounders ?

 

[Canadian packer]

There should be good value in the 7th round....terrible draft by packers

 

[CaliforniaCheez]

The last trade down(93) should have included a fifth round pick.

The trade value chart shows the Packers getting taken to the cleaners!!

 

[tromadz]

wasnt the general concensus that the trade chart is retarded?

 

[Canadian packer]

Maybe TT can trade all our this years picks for some next year so he doesn't have to draft any more players this year

 

[tromadz]

Maybe TT can trade all our this years picks for some next year so he doesn't have to draft any more players this year

:roll:

 

[longtimefan]

wasnt the general concensus that the trade chart is retarded?

As one talent evaluator stated, teams who treat the chart as gospel either (a) don't understand math or (b) don't have the guts to trust their instincts and make a decision without looking at the numbers. John Butler was a very well-respected, competent evaluator who trusted his instincts more than some forumla originally devised at MIT.


http://www.profootballweekly.com/PFW/NF ... eValue.htm

 

[Popcynical]

If this means more of a chance of us getting Setterstrom, I'm fine with it. Imagine Eslinger and Setterstrom.. mm..

 

[mattresell]

wasnt the general concensus that the trade chart is retarded?

As one talent evaluator stated, teams who treat the chart as gospel either (a) don't understand math or (b) don't have the guts to trust their instincts and make a decision without looking at the numbers. John Butler was a very well-respected, competent evaluator who trusted his instincts more than some forumla originally devised at MIT.


http://www.profootballweekly.com/PFW/NF ... eValue.htm

Good point. Formulas designed by those highly intelligent people MIT can't carry any real value can they? Sure they may have studied the history of the draft and tracked how each pick performed to come up with a logical conclusion as to the estimated value of each draft pick, but they're dorks right? No way I listen to them. The fact is I've seen ALMOST 10% of the college guys play this year and have done no extensive research on any of them. Those draft boards don't mean **** compared to what I know!

Paragraph above is laced with sarcasm - in case you didn't get it.