Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!
Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers.

You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user. Sign up or
Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions.

Walker and other topic article

Discussion in 'Packer Fan Forum' started by stump5454, Jun 25, 2005.

  1. stump5454 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Message Count:
    56
    Location:
    Gulfport
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Packers need Walker


    Javon Walker By Doug Ritchay , dritchay@sbcglobal.net
    Date: Jun 25, 2005

    The biggest story this off-season for the Green Bay Packers has been the absence of Pro Bowl wide receiver Javon Walker from the team's first two minicamps.

    That is just the tip of the iceberg, though, because when training camp opens later this summer most expect Walker to be a holdout for who knows how long. Walker attained the services of agent Drew Rosenhaus this off-season, and any team who has a player with Rosenhaus as an agent moans and groans just like we do when we eat too much pizza.
    We don't know how much camp Walker could miss. A day, a week, a month, the start of the season? Rosenhaus believes Walker has earned the right to a new deal after exploding on the NFL scene last year, catching 89 passes for 1,382 yards and 12 touchdowns. Rosenhaus has a point
  2. PackerTraxx Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Mar 7, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,028
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    I wish Walker would just come to his senses, come to camp, have a great year, and then the Pack works something out with him. Then we would not have to be reading and hearing about it everyday. :-?

    Moss and Culpepper's comments were interesting. If Culpepper had to throw to the Raider recievers(before Moss) how well might he have done? I don't think Collins is as good, but he may not be very much behind.
  3. packedhouse01 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jun 4, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,560
    Ratings Received:
    +1 / 0 / -0
    I've said this before about Walker. He is a receiver on the rise. His potential is yet to be determined, but his output last year indicates that the kid could become a great player. The problem is that his recent episode with holding out with two years left on his contract also offers a certain degree of distrust as to whether he will again want to redo his contract in another year. You sign him to a new contract now and then he reaches that potential, he's not going to be someone's deal, he's going to demand even more. In other words, he's never going to be satisfied. Unfortunately his true color have shown through bright and bold. I hate to say it but it appears to be the truth.
  4. PackerTraxx Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Mar 7, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,028
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    That's why I've said all along to let Walker sit, both years if neccessary.

    It will also be interesting to see what Moss meant to the Queens.
  5. packedhouse01 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jun 4, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,560
    Ratings Received:
    +1 / 0 / -0
    Moss was an incredible receiver when he wanted to be. He was also an equally incredible distraction to his team. I believe sincerely that the Vikqueens will be better without him.
  6. rabidgopher04 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,467
    Location:
    Boston, MA
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Most teams do end up better after getting rid of their superstar. I've seen plenty of times when a team trades away its one superstar for a couple of decent players it often does better because its not built around one guy anymore.
  7. wpr Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jun 3, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,517
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    I think Walker is a special player or at least he can be with another solid yr or two.
    I think he is more a product of the system than anything.
    Fergie will be less of an injury risk if he stays off the special teams and with all the new young kids with speed being signed I don't see why they would want to put him back there again. Also keep in mind finally got his eyesight corrected which is a whole nuther issue. :roll:
    If both he AND Bubba are holdouts then GB has a real problem. If Bubba signs and Walker sits then they will just go the the RB's out of the backfield and Bubba down the middle more. I don't think they will miss Walker as much as he will miss them (his pay check).
  8. PackerTraxx Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Mar 7, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,028
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    If Walker comes back I hope he come back fairly early in camp so he is in good FB shape when the season starts. It seems so many that come in after the season starts end up getting injured.
  9. CaliforniaCheez Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Apr 13, 2005
    Message Count:
    2,486
    Location:
    Citrus Heights CA
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Holdout = Injury Later

    Just assume he will not be there and what ever we get is a bonus.
  10. NDPackerFan Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    May 20, 2005
    Message Count:
    2,253
    Location:
    North Dakota
    Ratings Received:
    +4 / 0 / -0
    I think he'll be there in camp plenty early. He's aware that if he does want a big payday, holding out and risking injury only sets back the $$$ contract. He doesn't have any leverage in this and I think he'll be in camp IMHO.

    Look for #84 to have a big year and get the extension he's looking for. He doesn't yet seem bitter toward GB or vice-versa as was the case with McKenzie.
  11. Greg C. Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    May 31, 2005
    Message Count:
    2,856
    Location:
    Marquette, Michigan
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Wasn't Doug Ritchay the guy who used to write the "Ask the Expert" column for the Green Bay News Chronicle? I liked that column when he did it.

    Anyway, there's no denying that Walker's holdout could have a big impact on the team's fortunes this season. Too bad. I just don't see any way to redo his contract now without setting the stage for more holdouts by other players down the road.

    As for Moss's comment, it's far-fetched, but it makes sense if you think of Collins and Culpepper just in terms of pure passing ability. Collins throws the ball about as well as Culpepper. The difference is that Culpepper is extremely tough and mobile, while Collins is a brittle statue.

Share This Page