Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!
Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers.

You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user. Sign up or
Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions.

Trade Greg Jennings?

Discussion in 'Packer Fan Forum' started by ivo610, Sep 13, 2012.

  1. AmishMafia There's cheese under that hat

    Member Since:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Message Count:
    1,490
    Location:
    The heart of Amish Country, Las Vegas, NV
    Ratings Received:
    +948 / 22 / -2
    Raji saw my post. He had a couple great plays where he absolutely blew up the OL trying to block him. Nice work! I wonder what was different?
  2. fettpett Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Feb 1, 2011
    Message Count:
    928
    Location:
    Exile in SW Michigan
    Ratings Received:
    +217 / 3 / -0
    If Jenning's stay's hurt, other guys are going to HAVE to step it up, especially Nelson and Cobb.
  3. Marem19 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Feb 6, 2011
    Message Count:
    72
    Ratings Received:
    +28 / 0 / -0
    While Greg has been hurt he makes us so much better so I want us to keep him. I say trade Finley and use some of that for keeping jennings
    • Agree Agree x 2
  4. ivo610 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2010
    Message Count:
    13,558
    Location:
    Madison
    Ratings Received:
    +2,853 / 62 / -10
    Fresh? Less snaps? Easy comp?
  5. jaybadger82 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jan 17, 2012
    Message Count:
    452
    Ratings Received:
    +174 / 16 / -2
    Packer Fan Since:
    1992
    Definitely agree.

    I think you're mistaken about what was being debated in that other thread.

    From the Packers perspective, letting Jennings go appears to make a lot of sense with all the other contracts coming up.
  6. Einstein McFly Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jun 15, 2012
    Message Count:
    68
    Ratings Received:
    +22 / 2 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    1988
    They'll keep him if they think they have a good chance of winning it all this year. No way they can keep him and Rodgers, and Mathews. Maybe they'd pick him over Raji, but probably not. Thing is, as good as Jennings is, they have Nelson and it looks like Cobb is going to be their next big weapon. I'm really interested to see what they do here...
  7. HardRightEdge Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jul 28, 2012
    Message Count:
    1,392
    Location:
    Buffalo, NY
    Ratings Received:
    +605 / 16 / -3
    Packer Fan Since:
    1959
    Oh, right...all that tilting at the "security" windmill.
    • Old Old x 1
  8. ThxJackVainisi Lifelong Packers Fanatic

    Member Since:
    Feb 22, 2011
    Message Count:
    1,760
    Ratings Received:
    +1,108 / 13 / -4
    I believe Finley is due a $3.5M roster bonus in March of 2013 and then a salary of $4.45M (along with $300K in off season workout bonuses). That approximate $8M all counts against the cap so that would be a significant savings. We’ll find out in March what their plans for him are. We all know he’s got great physical talent and creates the kind of mismatches McCarthy loves to exploit. But if he’s not reliable catching and hanging onto the ball, the mismatch becomes meaningless. Let’s hope he plays so well the rest of this season he causes the Packers to make a tough decision, one way or another
  9. Shawnsta3 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Aug 19, 2011
    Message Count:
    714
    Location:
    Manawa & Shawano, WI
    Ratings Received:
    +197 / 34 / -1
    Packer Fan Since:
    1996
    The only way I see us keeping Jennings is if a James Jones scenario happens and the market doesn't throw money at him so he comes back to Green Bay.

    This likely won't happen unless he struggles throughout the year though.
    • Super Moderator

    longtimefan Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Message Count:
    13,928
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    Ratings Received:
    +1,780 / 50 / -5
    Packer Fan Since:
    1975
    Trade him for what?

    Old bag of chips?
    • Funny Funny x 1
  10. packers020802 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jan 28, 2010
    Message Count:
    434
    Location:
    FDL, WI
    Ratings Received:
    +53 / 5 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    1981
    GJ will not talk contract during the season.
    He is going to be the #1 FA next off-season.
    I never really thought about trading him though.
    It would make a lot of sense.
    BUT...
    I really think we could use him for this years playoff / SB run.....
    every weapon counts when #12 is at the helm and #85 just might be his best one.

    I'd say keep him.

    But then he's gone in FA, along with JFin

    (imho)
  11. HyponGrey Caseus Locutus Est

    Member Since:
    Mar 18, 2012
    Message Count:
    2,525
    Location:
    Mount Laurel, New Jersey
    Ratings Received:
    +694 / 35 / -2
    Packer Fan Since:
    1998
    You mean JMike gets cut? Because we definitely have another year on that contract with 3.5mil guaranteed next year.
  12. ivo610 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2010
    Message Count:
    13,558
    Location:
    Madison
    Ratings Received:
    +2,853 / 62 / -10
    Yeah he gets the 3.5 mil bonus in march and gets 4.45 on the season
  13. packers020802 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jan 28, 2010
    Message Count:
    434
    Location:
    FDL, WI
    Ratings Received:
    +53 / 5 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    1981
    So you guys are saying TT is going to pay him close to 8 Million just for average TE productivity next season?
  14. HyponGrey Caseus Locutus Est

    Member Since:
    Mar 18, 2012
    Message Count:
    2,525
    Location:
    Mount Laurel, New Jersey
    Ratings Received:
    +694 / 35 / -2
    Packer Fan Since:
    1998
    Only if the counseling doesn't work.
  15. HyponGrey Caseus Locutus Est

    Member Since:
    Mar 18, 2012
    Message Count:
    2,525
    Location:
    Mount Laurel, New Jersey
    Ratings Received:
    +694 / 35 / -2
    Packer Fan Since:
    1998
    He may have also seen that there are more than a few high round NT who are eligible for this coming years draft.
  16. ivo610 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2010
    Message Count:
    13,558
    Location:
    Madison
    Ratings Received:
    +2,853 / 62 / -10
    Very possible he could move on if Finley doesn't deliver this season
  17. ThxJackVainisi Lifelong Packers Fanatic

    Member Since:
    Feb 22, 2011
    Message Count:
    1,760
    Ratings Received:
    +1,108 / 13 / -4
    Finley is due a roster bonus next March. That’s not guaranteed; it’s conditional as he has to be on the roster to collect it. Although it involved a lot of money, Finley signed a contract favorable to the Packers – just a two year deal including guarantees for just one. In exchange, the Packers agreed to the roster bonus so they have to decide before (or at) the beginning of the UFA period next year whether to pay it or not. That gives Finley the leverage of becoming a UFA and offering his services to any NFL team. As I understand it, a roster bonus is different than a signing bonus as it isn’t prorated: IOW the roster bonus due Finley is entirely voidable in both actual payment and with regard to cap consequences. What happens many times in this situation if the team wants to retain the player due such a bonus is the team and player agree to a long-term contract with a signing bonus that is prorated, thus lessening the cap ramifications for the team and providing multi-year security for the player. Because of the need to extend Rodgers, Matthews, Raji, and perhaps Jennings it doesn’t look to me like that’s going to happen.

    Finley is one of the least popular Packers among Packers fans but IMO he deserves credit for agreeing to this contract which is, in effect, a one year bet on himself.
  18. HyponGrey Caseus Locutus Est

    Member Since:
    Mar 18, 2012
    Message Count:
    2,525
    Location:
    Mount Laurel, New Jersey
    Ratings Received:
    +694 / 35 / -2
    Packer Fan Since:
    1998
    I have a new found respect for him. Hope he can win that bet, it'd be nice to see him return to form. Maybe his training with Fitz will kick in soon
  19. _Xyn Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Oct 19, 2011
    Message Count:
    70
    Ratings Received:
    +7 / 1 / -1
    As hard as it's to say, let him go. Our other receivers are good enough to play on a great level. The money can be spend elsewhere. Remember, it's just a business!

    Also, if anyone is clueless, we spent a lot of draft picks on W/R's for a reason, also with Cobb emerging, Jennings is not coming back, sorry. Just so you're not totally surprised.
  20. FrankRizzo Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    May 2, 2010
    Message Count:
    4,249
    Location:
    Dallas
    Ratings Received:
    +999 / 22 / -3
    Teams most likely to trade/want Jennings (come March/April when a trade is likely):

    -Rams
    -Chargers
    -Browns
    -Dolphins
  21. ivo610 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2010
    Message Count:
    13,558
    Location:
    Madison
    Ratings Received:
    +2,853 / 62 / -10
    Skins
  22. Bensalama21 Ben

    Member Since:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Message Count:
    1,310
    Location:
    Charlotte
    Ratings Received:
    +469 / 10 / -0
    Average productivity... But he is also opening up the field for everyone else by drawing all of the attention and safeties over the top.
    • Agree Agree x 1
  23. Ceodore Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Oct 12, 2011
    Message Count:
    302
    Location:
    Dixon, IL
    Ratings Received:
    +92 / 2 / -0
    With the Packers mentality of dumping a player a year too early than too late, and his recent string of injuries (knee problems and his lingering groin issue) combined with the amount he'll be asking for, i think its safe to say hes probably a goner after this year. Especially with Cobb and maybe Jones coming into their own.
  24. bozz_2006 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Mar 24, 2006
    Message Count:
    4,425
    Location:
    Grand Forks, ND
    Ratings Received:
    +550 / 3 / -0
    I agree. Economics of the game.

Share This Page