Todd Pinkston

OP
OP
Zero2Cool

Zero2Cool

I own a website
Joined
Dec 12, 2004
Messages
11,903
Reaction score
4
Location
Green Bay, WI

SuperRat

Cheesehead
Joined
Sep 18, 2005
Messages
617
Reaction score
0
Wow I was waiting for somebody to bring up getting Pinkston but after it didn't happen right away I figured the forum members had enough sense not to mention it. I would rather have a dead moose as wide reciever than Todd Pinkston. Freddie Mitchell is still available, he would be better than Todd Pinkston. Yeah Jennings has dropped a few balls recently but he isn't afraid to go over the middle. Anybody that wants Pinkston, watch that video clip a few more times. He didn't try to catch the ball because he is afraid to get hit. The Packers have no room for that kind of crap.
 
OP
OP
Zero2Cool

Zero2Cool

I own a website
Joined
Dec 12, 2004
Messages
11,903
Reaction score
4
Location
Green Bay, WI
SuperRat said:
Wow I was waiting for somebody to bring up getting Pinkston but after it didn't happen right away I figured the forum members had enough sense not to mention it.
Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 6:24 am

Not even a full 24hrs after he was cut.

Have enough sense not to insult someone for posting information.
 

SuperRat

Cheesehead
Joined
Sep 18, 2005
Messages
617
Reaction score
0
It isnt you that is ridiculous in this thread. That is understandable if you dont know much about the reciever and were just wondering. The people talking about how pinkston is better than ferguson and gardner and say that he would be a good pickup that are nuts. Pinkston is known for not wanting to be hit. He is known for missing a wide open catch i think last year or the year before because he "lost the ball in the lights" though it looked like he was just scared there as well, not to mention this more recent case of not trying to catch the ball because he is scared. I dont like Ferguson at all but I would rather have him than Pinkston.
 

DePack

Cheesehead
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Messages
3,904
Reaction score
1
Location
Newark, Delaware
SuperRat said:
It isnt you that is ridiculous in this thread. That is understandable if you dont know much about the reciever and were just wondering. The people talking about how pinkston is better than ferguson and gardner and say that he would be a good pickup that are nuts. Pinkston is known for not wanting to be hit. He is known for missing a wide open catch i think last year or the year before because he "lost the ball in the lights" though it looked like he was just scared there as well, not to mention this more recent case of not trying to catch the ball because he is scared. I dont like Ferguson at all but I would rather have him than Pinkston.

I've watched him for 6-7 years....he blows!
 

tromadz

Cheesehead
Joined
Aug 16, 2005
Messages
999
Reaction score
3
Location
Chicago
so bring in another suckbag? TT did that with Boreigter and you guys bashed him. But ..do it again, right?

wow.
 

TomAllen

Cheesehead
Joined
Jun 26, 2006
Messages
365
Reaction score
0
tromadz said:
so bring in another suckbag? TT did that with Boreigter and you guys bashed him. But ..do it again, right?

wow.

This suckbag is a little better than the 2 suckbags on the Packer roster now.
 
OP
OP
Zero2Cool

Zero2Cool

I own a website
Joined
Dec 12, 2004
Messages
11,903
Reaction score
4
Location
Green Bay, WI

TomAllen

Cheesehead
Joined
Jun 26, 2006
Messages
365
Reaction score
0
Yeah..

HOw many interceptions did Robert Ferguson cause by not going for the ball?

Answer: Quite a few.

I really don't care about Pinkston, just get rid of Fergusen TT, and go after Porter or Branch...or someone decent...jeez!
 
OP
OP
Zero2Cool

Zero2Cool

I own a website
Joined
Dec 12, 2004
Messages
11,903
Reaction score
4
Location
Green Bay, WI
TomAllen said:
Yeah..

HOw many interceptions did Robert Ferguson cause by not going for the ball?

Answer: Quite a few.

I really don't care about Pinkston, just get rid of Fergusen TT, and go after Porter or Branch...or someone decent...jeez!


You don't care about Pinkston now? Okay. That's cool. I can dig that.


I agree. Get rid of Ferguson.
Jerry Porter could be good for use. I'd rather see Deion Branch though.
 

TomAllen

Cheesehead
Joined
Jun 26, 2006
Messages
365
Reaction score
0
Yeah, if you see my initial post, I said i wasn't that hot on him..but I really do believe he'd be an upgrade over Fergie and Gardner.
 

arrowgargantuan

Cheesehead
Joined
Dec 9, 2004
Messages
3,643
Reaction score
2
Location
San Jose, Ca.
1. Pinkston is coming off a season ending injury.

2. He was just cut by a team with Less talent in the WR dept. than the Pack.

that speaks volumes to me.
 

pyledriver80

Cheesehead
Joined
May 31, 2005
Messages
2,391
Reaction score
0
Trom, do you think I care if everyone thinks Pinkston sucks? I still say go get him. Cut Ferguson and pick him up cheap. If I had a choice between Ferguson and Pinkston. I'd pick Pinkston in a minute.


Fergie
2002 Green Bay Packers 16 1 22 293 13.3 40 3 4 1 15
2003 Green Bay Packers 15 12 38 520 13.7 47 4 7 2 25
2004 Green Bay Packers 13 5 24 367 15.3 48 1 8 1 18
2005 Green Bay Packers 11 7 27 366 13.6 51 3 4 2 18


Pinkston
2001 Philadelphia Eagles 15 15 42 586 14.0 62 4 10 3 23
2002 Philadelphia Eagles 15 15 60 798 13.3 42 7 16 2 40
2003 Philadelphia Eagles 16 15 36 575 16.0 59 2 8 5 22
2004 Philadelphia Eagles 16 16 36 676 18.8 80 1 7 6 24
2005 Philadelphia Eagles 0 0 0 0 --- 0 0 0 0 0



More Touchdowns, Almost twice as many recieving yards and more receptions.


I don't know what the big deal is with him turning away from the hit. Fergie does it every other play. Maybe Todd didn't want to get his Uniform dirty, kind of like Woodson,Manual, and Pickett. It's definitely TT's kind of guy!
 

TomAllen

Cheesehead
Joined
Jun 26, 2006
Messages
365
Reaction score
0
arrowgargantuan said:
cmon, you don't think the eagles cut him for health reasons?

Stallworth is their #1 for god sake. they wouldn't cut a healthy Pinkston imo.

He'd have to pass a physical, right?
 

DePack

Cheesehead
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Messages
3,904
Reaction score
1
Location
Newark, Delaware
arrowgargantuan said:
1. Pinkston is coming off a season ending injury.

2. He was just cut by a team with Less talent in the WR dept. than the Pack.

that speaks volumes to me.

Hey you stole my post :wink:
 

Members online

Latest posts

Top