Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!
Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers.

You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user. Sign up or
Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions.

Thunder and lightning?

Discussion in 'Packer Fan Forum' started by ivo610, Oct 10, 2012.

  1. ivo610 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2010
    Message Count:
    13,554
    Location:
    Madison
    Ratings Received:
    +2,852 / 62 / -10
    Alex green is quick, elusive but not strong n fast bowling ball type. John Kuhn is. Is this the thunder and lightning the packers will rely on this season? Or will the run game look different?
  2. JBlood Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 4, 2004
    Message Count:
    1,770
    Ratings Received:
    +487 / 6 / -0
    Unless the line learns how to block, there won't be a run game. Did you notice the o-line for Houston the other night? Very impressive.
  3. El Guapo I Scored A Perfect "1" On The Wonderlic

    Member Since:
    Dec 7, 2011
    Message Count:
    839
    Location:
    Land 'O Lakes
    Ratings Received:
    +354 / 13 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    1976
    I think that you'll see Starks worked back into the lineup with Saine and Green getting equal time to be the 3rd down or change-of-pace back. Kuhn doesn't bring the thunder.
  4. rodell330 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jun 18, 2012
    Message Count:
    1,134
    Location:
    Canton, Ohio
    Ratings Received:
    +405 / 70 / -7
    Packer Fan Since:
    1990
    Is Starks even going to play?
  5. Pack_Attack_Is_Back Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    May 12, 2008
    Message Count:
    39
    Ratings Received:
    +11 / 0 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    1986
    He's probable for the Texans.
  6. El Guapo I Scored A Perfect "1" On The Wonderlic

    Member Since:
    Dec 7, 2011
    Message Count:
    839
    Location:
    Land 'O Lakes
    Ratings Received:
    +354 / 13 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    1976
    I'm no insider, but from what I understand, they've been holding him back as long as possible to let his turf toe heal. Once Bensen was lost, I think that elevated Starks back into playing status
  7. JBlood Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 4, 2004
    Message Count:
    1,770
    Ratings Received:
    +487 / 6 / -0
    Starks will play, but if history holds true, he won't play too long. I hate labeling someone injury prone, but he seems to fit the bill.
  8. Poppa San A few empty spots here yet

    Member Since:
    Aug 29, 2010
    Message Count:
    2,978
    Location:
    Brown County Wisconsin
    Ratings Received:
    +589 / 17 / -1
    Packer Fan Since:
    1919
    So, since I got him in FF, I should play him now?
  9. MLB Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    May 4, 2012
    Message Count:
    46
    Ratings Received:
    +13 / 0 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    1957
    It depends who your other RBs are.
  10. Poppa San A few empty spots here yet

    Member Since:
    Aug 29, 2010
    Message Count:
    2,978
    Location:
    Brown County Wisconsin
    Ratings Received:
    +589 / 17 / -1
    Packer Fan Since:
    1919
    Bradshaw, law firm, Spiller
  11. Shawnsta3 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Aug 19, 2011
    Message Count:
    714
    Location:
    Manawa & Shawano, WI
    Ratings Received:
    +197 / 34 / -1
    Packer Fan Since:
    1996
    Yeah 3rd string back having not played in a year for the Packers, who as far as I know haven't had a 100 yard runner since Jim Taylor. Definite starter. Wish I was playing you this week lol
    • Funny Funny x 1
  12. JBlood Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 4, 2004
    Message Count:
    1,770
    Ratings Received:
    +487 / 6 / -0
    I hate FF, so I'm not the guy to ask....

Share This Page