The Draft and the Queens.................

some things never change. New regime, same idiot moves...thank God.

Only the Queens would trade two 3rd rounders (the MEAT of this draft) for Tavaris Jackson...a developmental QB who could have been had in the 5th or possibly 6th round.

A classic, to be sure.

Look for the sequel in April, 2007.

digs....who is their GM. Did they give all control to Childress?

They selected by committee...........a trio of decision makers. Fran Foley, Childress and Scott Studwell.

the trio of stupidity, lol I'm glad childress didn't come here, he sucks.

He began to cry like a little girl when T.O insulted him lol!

aint that the truth

Here's one site that had the 'queens draft grade pretty low. I've seen others too but this one is close to being accurate IMO:

http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/5559064

sigh...let's just see how our pick pans out first please...


Round 3 (#87): B.J. Sander, P, Ohio State

'


another post filled with true facts and high intelligence

link please?

Hey...nobody is debating the stupidity of BJ Sander...but at least he only cost us ONE 3rd rounder.

The Queens management kills me...always has....kills the team, too.

Sander was picked by Mike Sherman.

Ted Thompson doesn't make stupid picks like that, that pick was almost as stupid as the viqueen QB pick this year loooool!

Black quarterbacks doesn't win superbowls, nothing with their skincolour, but it's something with their style, it's too sloppy!

Wow. Just...wow. :shock:

You know what...with that post right there why even bother arguing anymore? You win! I'll take it that you do not represent the majority of Packer fans I have met in my life that actually have a brain.

sigh...like waiting for the Vikes to finally win a SB...

Just stating a site where I saw draft grades, don't get your panties in a bunch.

I couldn't resist this one...Was it me or was this forum filled with a deluge of angry posts about the manner in which TT was managing the team? Just curious.

it takes alot to get them in a bunch... and you are not doing it...just a proportionate response to your post was all it was

Hey...every fanbase is not homogenous in their view of how their organization is run. Sure..there are some who did/do not like the way TT is doing things....still are..some have reasons and some are just ranting idiots (again, every fanbase has these people). I have been labeled a TT *** kisser/apologist because I support him.

It would be cool when Johnson eats the turf after our linebackers get through with him. The vikings suck.

Last year the pundits had the Vikes going to the SB.
Hopefully they are as wrong this year about our draft.

With the new coach, owner, system and players, I don't see us competing for the North for a couple years.

OK, cool...no problem.

Yes you right of course "The Vikings Suck"

Now although I admire what your team did in the draft I would holf off on the "our linebackers" statement. Your talking about rookie linebackers busting through one of the best (if not the best) lines in the nfl. I like Hawk too...relax.

pretty low how bout they came in 31st out of 32 haha

Woah how did the vikings get the best offensive line in the nfl? I was fairly certain it was a well below average line.

"Screw you buddy."

Hutch, Birk, McKinnie... If they were only playing with those 3, it would be average. I am not sure who else they have, but the line will not be their problem.

Well that is kind of like saying last year that the Vikings were going to have the best secondary in the league with the free agents that they picked up. Didn't happen. Nobody knows how Birk is going to hold up and how Hutchinson is going to fit in. I would agree that it is looking like they will have a solid line, but saying that they will have one of the best if not the best lines in the league is being way way too generous.