Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!
Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers.

You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user. Sign up or
Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions.

The defensive changes

Discussion in 'Packer Fan Forum' started by longtimefan, Sep 15, 2012.

    • Super Moderator

    longtimefan Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Message Count:
    13,928
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    Ratings Received:
    +1,780 / 50 / -5
    Packer Fan Since:
    1975
  1. HyponGrey Caseus Locutus Est

    Member Since:
    Mar 18, 2012
    Message Count:
    2,525
    Location:
    Mount Laurel, New Jersey
    Ratings Received:
    +694 / 35 / -2
    Packer Fan Since:
    1998
    Didn't McMillions get the nickel nod?
  2. ExpatPacker No Longer Primed for the playoffs

    Member Since:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Message Count:
    703
    Location:
    A Galaxy Far, Far Away
    Ratings Received:
    +220 / 5 / -0
    It's too early to be disappointed by Nick Perry, but if he isn't our #2 OLB opposite of Matthews by the end of the season, I will be.
  3. HyponGrey Caseus Locutus Est

    Member Since:
    Mar 18, 2012
    Message Count:
    2,525
    Location:
    Mount Laurel, New Jersey
    Ratings Received:
    +694 / 35 / -2
    Packer Fan Since:
    1998
    I'll give him til next year. Same with Worthy and Sherrod.
  4. packers020802 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jan 28, 2010
    Message Count:
    434
    Location:
    FDL, WI
    Ratings Received:
    +53 / 5 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    1981
    Shields IN
    Bush OUT

    ~cheers~
  5. weeds Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 9, 2004
    Message Count:
    1,251
    Location:
    42 minutes south of Lambeau
    Ratings Received:
    +431 / 14 / -0
    I can't believe the Pack gave up 47 yards in the first half... slackers.... malingerers .... ;)
  6. bozz_2006 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Mar 24, 2006
    Message Count:
    4,425
    Location:
    Grand Forks, ND
    Ratings Received:
    +550 / 3 / -0
    My question is why didn't they go with guys like Shields, Worthy, Moses, and McMillian more in week one?
  7. 7thFloorRA Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jan 19, 2011
    Message Count:
    1,048
    Location:
    Ohio
    Ratings Received:
    +371 / 26 / -1
    Daniels, Heyward and MC had some good reps too.

    Great to see them finally dump CJ Wilson from the active roster. He has never done anything.

    As far as Perry goes...just let him be a guy in the rotation to keep fresh bodies attacking at full speed. He can learn and evolve from there.


    In other good defensive news.....don't forget Neal and House will be back soon as well.
  8. CHIpackFAN Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jan 18, 2012
    Message Count:
    55
    Ratings Received:
    +15 / 8 / -1
    Packer Fan Since:
    1992
    I think this could be start of something very very beautiful as far as the D goes. I think those young guys are super excited that they were able to not only contribute, but be effective. I think that they will now have a confidence about themselves and start to expect to play like that at all times.
    • Super Moderator

    longtimefan Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Message Count:
    13,928
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    Ratings Received:
    +1,780 / 50 / -5
    Packer Fan Since:
    1975
    Was in the story, didnt post it

    in: Jerron McMillian, Out: M.D. Jennings
    We’re not sure M.D. Jennings was ever really “in.” The safety position in the nickel has been a question mark since the season started, but Jennings was on top of the depth chart at one point. It looks like the rookie, Jerron McMillian, owns that job now. McMillian had two tackles and a pick on Thursday. He also looks like he’s picked up the defense a lot quicker than the rest of the rookies. We doubt you’ll be seeing much of Jennings the rest of the season. McMillian brings a physical presence and he’s only going to improv
  9. Jordyruns Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Message Count:
    282
    Location:
    Upstate NY
    Ratings Received:
    +82 / 4 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    1997
    100% agree I do not think one is worlds above another, I think the strength is in the depth and diversity of our 3 LOLB. Keep the fresh legs on the field and expose the tired OL. Hopefully this helps keep the D fresh all season long too, I don't want to have another situation like Raji and Walden's last year where they were pretty good at the beginning and useless by mid season.
  10. HyponGrey Caseus Locutus Est

    Member Since:
    Mar 18, 2012
    Message Count:
    2,525
    Location:
    Mount Laurel, New Jersey
    Ratings Received:
    +694 / 35 / -2
    Packer Fan Since:
    1998
    YUP :geek:
    Wilson wasn't dumped, he was injured. I think even he would have looked like a stud against that o-line.
    Agreed. Ease him in
    House will still be in a harness, he'll have to fight to get dime time IMO
  11. ThxJackVainisi Lifelong Packers Fanatic

    Member Since:
    Feb 22, 2011
    Message Count:
    1,760
    Ratings Received:
    +1,108 / 13 / -4
    No offense longtimefan but IMO your summary missed the most important changes and mischaracterized a couple of others:

    The link mentioned that Wilson was inactive because of a groin injury not because he got demoted. Of course I’m rooting for Worthy but I would caution about evaluating his play vs. the Bears’ OL vs. evaluating Wilson’s against a much, much better OL, the 49ers. I’m not sure the staff agrees that Wilson is “out”.

    Nick Perry got reduced snaps because of Walden’s return but also because he injured his wrist against the 9ers and was wearing a protector. Obviously his hands and wrists are extremely important to his game, particularly because strength is his the best part of his game (as opposed to coverage or finesse rush). Don’t get me wrong, Walden is the better pass rusher but IMO it’s incorrect to characterize Walden and Moses “in” and Perry “out”.

    IMO the three most important changes were:

    Shield’s play against the 49ers did indeed earn him the starting job as some of us posted (or hoped) after that game. While Williams and Burnett handled Marshall, Shields was mostly left one-on-one against Alshon Jeffery, the rookie WR the Bears are so excited about. Jeffery had one catch for 7 yards. Shield’s ascension is huge – his poor play in 2011 was due to his unwillingness to tackle and apparently his unfamiliarity with anything other than coverage (eg base defense). IOW he was a fantastic sub in ’10 because all he had to worry about was covering receivers. It took him a while but his off season talk about improving his tackling and willingness to do so has been turned into action. If he keeps this up this is fantastic news – along with Williams return to health they’ve significantly upgraded their starting CBs without making a personnel move. Their improved coverage will "improve" the rush of the DL and LBs.

    The one of the four changes mentioned in the link you didn’t list was second most important IMO: McMillian taking over for MD Jennings is another significant upgrade. Unlike Worthy vs. Wilson, we saw McMillian outplay Jennings vs. the 49ers. McMillian brings a physical presence and displayed a nose for the ball. Again, we shouldn’t get too excited because it was the Bears’ offense but the experience McMillian is gaining should continue to pay dividends throughout the season.

    The next most important change is also significant IMO. Casey Hayward took over for Bush as the sixth DB in sub packages. On many teams that wouldn’t be as big a deal but because the Packers will play nickel and dime a lot this season it is for the Packers. Beyond that, the more experience Hayward gets, the better. Bush is a great STs player – lets hope his playing time is restricted to STs going forward.

    I’m concerned about how House’s shoulder brace will affect his play but at some point his shoulder will heal and when it does he’ll push for playing time. With Shields’ improved play, House’s return at some point, and Hayward getting experience, the young CBs look very promising for the future. And Tramon is only 29 years old.
    • Super Moderator

    longtimefan Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Message Count:
    13,928
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    Ratings Received:
    +1,780 / 50 / -5
    Packer Fan Since:
    1975
    No offense taken..I just saw it and posted it lol
  12. HyponGrey Caseus Locutus Est

    Member Since:
    Mar 18, 2012
    Message Count:
    2,525
    Location:
    Mount Laurel, New Jersey
    Ratings Received:
    +694 / 35 / -2
    Packer Fan Since:
    1998
    This. This makes me feel smug. To think that so many were so incredibly worried about the CB position this offseason. ;)

Share This Page